CVE-2026-101049

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: Elevated riskExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMhigh confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity65% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 27, 2026

Last Modified

September 28, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

Heym before 0.0.53 Slack Webhook Signature Verification Bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/heym-before-0.0.53-slack-webhook-signature-verification-bypass
github_commit Patch Available

commit 341d1012367c (heymrun/heym)

Patch available: heymrun/heym v0.0.88 (contains commit 341d1012367c)

https://github.com/heymrun/heym/commit/341d1012367cd74f85c617e1c98dd49e3fcb5e83
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Multiple auth/RCE vulnerabilities: workflow condition eval sandbox escape, Slack/Telegram webhook auth bypass, OAuth redirect_uri XSS, plaintext token storage · Advisory · heymrun/heym · GitHub

https://github.com/heymrun/heym/security/advisories/GHSA-pm6h-x3h5-j38h

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-101049(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-04 05:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-03 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-03 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-02 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-02 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-01 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-29 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-29 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-28 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-28 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-28 14:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-28 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-27 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-27 16:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-101049?
CVE-2026-101049 is a medium vulnerability published on September 27, 2026. Heym before 0.0.53 fails to verify Slack request signatures when trigger nodes lack credential IDs or have empty signing secrets. Remote unauthenticated attackers can send forged Slack events to known webhook URLs to trigger workflows with the owner's credentials.
When was CVE-2026-101049 disclosed?
CVE-2026-101049 was first published on September 27, 2026, with the most recent update on September 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-101049 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-101049 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-101049?
CVE-2026-101049 has a CVSS base score of 6.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-101049?
A fix for CVE-2026-101049 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-101049 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-101049

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-101049?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.