Froxlor 2.0.0 through 2.3.10 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. When a customer (the lowest-privileged authenticated role) uploads an SSL certificate for one of their own domains, the Certificates API add()/update() methods parse it with openssl_x509_parse() and store the issuer organization (issuer['O']) value verbatim without sanitization. Froxlor's table-listing renderer then emits scalar cells through Twig's raw filter, disabling HTML auto-escaping, so when an administrator or reseller opens Domains > SSL certificates the attacker-supplied issuer value executes as script in the privileged user's session. This crosses a privilege boundary from customer to admin and can result in full administrator account takeover; because a Froxlor admin controls webserver, DNS, and PHP configuration applied by a cron job running as root, the issue can be further escalated to command execution as root on the managed server. The issue is fixed in Froxlor 2.3.12.
CVE-2026-100720
Score 8.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity87% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 10th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 26, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Froxlor before 2.3.12 Stored XSS via SSL certificate issuer | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/froxlor-before-2.3.12-stored-xss-via-ssl-certificate-issuerStored XSS via SSL certificate issuer enables customer-to-admin account takeover in Froxlor 2.x · Advisory · froxlor/froxlor · GitHub
https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-89vj-gqqr-73p8Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100720(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-04 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 11:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100720?
When was CVE-2026-100720 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100720 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100720?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100720?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100720
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100720?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.