Netty versions from 4.2.11.Final before 4.2.18.Final contain an incomplete hostname verification fix in the QUIC certificate verification path when using a plain X509TrustManager. The BoringSSLCertificateVerifyCallback discards the SSLEngine for plain trust managers, preventing endpoint identification from running even when HTTPS verification is configured. Attackers on the network path can present a certificate chain for the wrong hostname that the plain trust manager accepts, bypassing hostname authentication for QUIC clients.
CVE-2026-100665
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 65EG Risk 65/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 19th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
October 2, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Sep 26, 2026Netty 4.2.11 through 4.2.17 QUIC Hostname Verification Bypass | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/netty-4.2.11-through-4.2.17-quic-hostname-verification-bypasscommit 994e887ed9 (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.2.11.Final (contains commit 994e887ed9)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/994e887ed9commit 09e72c4fd800 (netty/netty)
Patch available: netty/netty netty-4.1.135.Final (contains commit 09e72c4fd800)
https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/09e72c4fd8007277121ed48db63a124b112b96feIncomplete fix for CVE-2026-50010: QUIC clients still bypass hostname verification with a plain X509TrustManager · Advisory · netty/netty · GitHub
https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-mj35-3qqm-q387Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100665(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
Show 13 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 13:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100665?
When was CVE-2026-100665 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100665 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100665?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100665?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100665
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100665?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.