OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.8.1 fails to apply the originating requester's effective tool policy during Active Memory automatic recall. In deployments that use Active Memory together with requester-specific tool rules, deterministic and hidden recall paths can retrieve durable memory and inject it into the agent's context even when toolsBySender explicitly denies that requester access to the memory tools (memory_search, memory_get). As a result, an admitted but denied sender can receive information derived from durable memory in the agent's response without directly invoking any memory tool. The issue is fixed in 2026.8.1.
CVE-2026-100537
Score 3.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-26. A secondary CVSS source baseline 3.1; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.1
- EG Score
- 3.1LOWhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 14EG Risk 14/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity31% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 7th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 26, 2026
Last Modified
September 29, 2026
References (2)
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-100537(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 02:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-100537?
When was CVE-2026-100537 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-100537 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-100537?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-100537?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-100537
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-100537?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.