manga-image-translator contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the shared API server mode due to unsafe deserialization of untrusted pickle data in the share.py module, where the /execute/{method_name} and /simple_execute/{method_name} endpoints deserialize attacker-controlled HTTP request bodies using pickle.loads(). A remote attacker can supply a crafted pickle payload to these endpoints to execute arbitrary code in the server process, resulting in full container compromise when running in the default Docker deployment as root.
CVE-2026-10042
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-05-29. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-33328 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 60EG Risk 60/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, then apply it. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 49th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Until the release ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, then apply it.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 29, 2026
Last Modified
July 21, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026[Bug]: Unauthenticated RCE via pickle deserialization in shared API server · Issue #1141 · zyddnys/manga-image-translator · GitHub
https://github.com/zyddnys/manga-image-translator/issues/1141manga-image-translator RCE via Unsafe Pickle Deserialization in Share Model | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/manga-image-translator-rce-via-unsafe-pickle-deserialization-in-share-modelfix: use restricted_loads in /execute endpoint to prevent RCE (CWE-502)
Fix merged in zyddnys/manga-image-translator PR #1142 on 2026-05-19 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zyddnys/manga-image-translator/pull/1142commit d7441481a7ed (zyddnys/manga-image-translator)
Fix landed in zyddnys/manga-image-translator commit d7441481a7ed — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zyddnys/manga-image-translator/commit/d7441481a7ed3236b4e0456670a9962a8c82d94dVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-10042(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 500 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 400 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-11-01 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-11-01 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-31 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 02:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-30 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-29 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 04:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-28 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-27 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-26 04:10 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 04:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-25 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-24 06:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-23 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-22 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-21 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-20 11:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-19 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-18 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-16 08:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-15 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-14 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-12 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-14 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xx7c-f2fq-qmv3 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-13 02:09 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-10042?
When was CVE-2026-10042 made public?
Is CVE-2026-10042 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-10042?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10042?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-10042
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10042?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.