In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2026-0038
Score 8.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-03-02. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 8.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.4
- EG Score
- 8.4(medium)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity84% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 14%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 2, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (8)
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/1bf8033b56a45165602f8116e0a0d2e767f1e8ae
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/513ea99ae008b81dd266bf6e361627c058ddde41
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/652b7b6bf9a62cc12c3a071bab4e92314f046739
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/7e1d15d29b7fe0f858926a8bcaf929b75db9e52a
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/b23a5bfa1fb8f9525e21f095a87486a2bd856321
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/d884f499434c224285c30d460681f1ce76a8cf1f
- security@androidhttps://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/f090d4b083a9ef4831f99e692c239542dd385cb4
- security@androidhttps://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2026/2026-03-01
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-0038(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 6× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-0038?
When was CVE-2026-0038 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-0038 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-0038?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-0038?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-0038
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-0038?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.