Contrast is a confidential-computing runtime for Kubernetes. In versions before 1.4.1, a recovering Coordinator does not verify the seed supplied by the recovering party. An attacker can therefore stand up a rogue Coordinator whose manifest passes validation but whose secret seed is attacker-controlled. If network traffic is redirected from the legitimate Coordinator to the attacker's Coordinator, a workload owner can be impersonated when they either set a new manifest without comparing the returned root CA certificate against the existing one (the default behavior of the contrast CLI) or verify the Coordinator without comparing the root CA certificate against a trusted reference. Under these conditions the attacker can issue certificates that chain back to the rogue Coordinator's root CA and recover arbitrary workload secrets of workloads deployed after the attack. Secrets of the legitimate Coordinator (seed, workload secrets, CA), workload integrity, and certificates chaining to the mesh CA are not affected.
CVE-2025-71426
Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 32EG Risk 32/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity71% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 2nd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 27, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026Contrast before 1.4.1 Coordinator Impersonation via Unauthenticated Recovery | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/contrast-before-1.4.1-coordinator-impersonation-via-unauthenticated-recoveryUnauthenticated recovery allows Coordinator impersonation · Advisory · edgelesssys/contrast · GitHub
https://github.com/edgelesssys/contrast/security/advisories/GHSA-vqv5-385r-2hf8Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-71426(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/edgelesssys/contrast | — | 1.4.1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 18:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 15:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 01:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
8 shownGo:github.com/edgelesssys/contrast
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-71426?
When was CVE-2025-71426 disclosed?
Is CVE-2025-71426 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-71426?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-71426?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-71426
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-71426?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.