CVE-2025-71299

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

spi: cadence-quadspi: Parse DT for flashes with the rest of the DT parsing

The recent refactoring of where runtime PM is enabled done in commit f1eb4e792bb1 ("spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: Enable pm runtime earlier to avoid imbalance") made the fact that when we do a pm_runtime_disable() in the error paths of probe() we can trigger a runtime disable which in turn results in duplicate clock disables. This is particularly likely to happen when there is missing or broken DT description for the flashes attached to the controller.

Early on in the probe function we do a pm_runtime_get_noresume() since the probe function leaves the device in a powered up state but in the error path we can't assume that PM is enabled so we also manually disable everything, including clocks. This means that when runtime PM is active both it and the probe function release the same reference to the main clock for the IP, triggering warnings from the clock subsystem:

[ 8.693719] clk:75:7 already disabled [ 8.693791] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 185 at /usr/src/kernel/drivers/clk/clk.c:1188 clk_core_disable+0xa0/0xb ... [ 8.694261] clk_core_disable+0xa0/0xb4 (P) [ 8.694272] clk_disable+0x38/0x60 [ 8.694283] cqspi_probe+0x7c8/0xc5c [spi_cadence_quadspi] [ 8.694309] platform_probe+0x5c/0xa4

Dealing with this issue properly is complicated by the fact that we don't know if runtime PM is active so can't tell if it will disable the clocks or not. We can, however, sidestep the issue for the flash descriptions by moving their parsing to when we parse the controller properties which also save us doing a bunch of setup which can never be used so let's do that.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

May 14, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

spi: cadence-quadspi: Parse DT for flashes with the rest of the DT parsing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcaa104ad9c860a6dbd5797919e0ec0b1cd5a57a
generic

spi: cadence-quadspi: Parse DT for flashes with the rest of the DT parsing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9f0736a4e136a6eb61e0cf530ddc18ab6d816ba3
generic

spi: cadence-quadspi: Parse DT for flashes with the rest of the DT parsing - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08dca4c8099a41a9fa3be128a793387603f73a17

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-71299(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.18.16osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (113 versions)6.19.6-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 58× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 231 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-23 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 11:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-17 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-17 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-16 04:39 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-16 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-15 00:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-15 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-14 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-14 03:14 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-14 03:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-12 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-12 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-11 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-11 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-11 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-11 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-11 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-10 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-10 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-09 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-09 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-09 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-07 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-07 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-06 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-06 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-06 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-05 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-05 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-05 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-03 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-03 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-03 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-03 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-03 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-02 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-02 03:23 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-02 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-23 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-16 05:49 UTCOSV refresh
  73. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-71299?
CVE-2025-71299 is a medium vulnerability published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spi: cadence-quadspi: Parse DT for flashes with the rest of the DT parsing The recent refactoring of where runtime PM is enabled done in commit f1eb4e792bb1 ("spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: Enable pm runtime earlier to avoid imbalance")…
When was CVE-2025-71299 disclosed?
CVE-2025-71299 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 8, 2026, with the most recent update on May 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-71299 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-71299 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-71299?
CVE-2025-71299 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-71299?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-71299, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-71299

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-71299?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.