CVE-2025-71201

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-02-14. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfs: Fix early read unlock of page with EOF in middle

The read result collection for buffered reads seems to run ahead of the completion of subrequests under some circumstances, as can be seen in the following log snippet:

9p_client_res: client 18446612686390831168 response P9_TREAD tag 0 err 0 ... netfs_sreq: R=00001b55[1] DOWN TERM f=192 s=0 5fb2/5fb2 s=5 e=0 ... netfs_collect_folio: R=00001b55 ix=00004 r=4000-5000 t=4000/5fb2 netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00004-00004 read-done netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00004-00004 read-unlock netfs_collect_folio: R=00001b55 ix=00005 r=5000-5fb2 t=5000/5fb2 netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00005-00005 read-done netfs_folio: i=157f3 ix=00005-00005 read-unlock ... netfs_collect_stream: R=00001b55[0:] cto=5fb2 frn=ffffffff netfs_collect_state: R=00001b55 col=5fb2 cln=6000 n=c netfs_collect_stream: R=00001b55[0:] cto=5fb2 frn=ffffffff netfs_collect_state: R=00001b55 col=5fb2 cln=6000 n=8 ... netfs_sreq: R=00001b55[2] ZERO SUBMT f=000 s=5fb2 0/4e s=0 e=0 netfs_sreq: R=00001b55[2] ZERO TERM f=102 s=5fb2 4e/4e s=5 e=0

The 'cto=5fb2' indicates the collected file pos we've collected results to so far - but we still have 0x4e more bytes to go - so we shouldn't have collected folio ix=00005 yet. The 'ZERO' subreq that clears the tail happens after we unlock the folio, allowing the application to see the uncleared tail through mmap.

The problem is that netfs_read_unlock_folios() will unlock a folio in which the amount of read results collected hits EOF position - but the ZERO subreq lies beyond that and so happens after.

Fix this by changing the end check to always be the end of the folio and never the end of the file.

In the future, I should look at clearing to the end of the folio here rather than adding a ZERO subreq to do this. On the other hand, the ZERO subreq can run in parallel with an async READ subreq. Further, the ZERO subreq may still be necessary to, say, handle extents in a ceph file that don't have any backing store and are thus implicitly all zeros.

This can be reproduced by creating a file, the size of which doesn't align to a page boundary, e.g. 24998 (0x5fb2) bytes and then doing something like:

xfs_io -c "mmap -r 0 0x6000" -c "madvise -d 0 0x6000" \ -c "mread -v 0 0x6000" /xfstest.test/x

The last 0x4e bytes should all be 00, but if the tail hasn't been cleared yet, you may see rubbish there. This can be reproduced with kafs by modifying the kernel to disable the call to netfs_read_subreq_progress() and to stop afs_issue_read() from doing the async call for NETFS_READAHEAD. Reproduction can be made easier by inserting an mdelay(100) in netfs_issue_read() for the ZERO-subreq case.

AFS and CIFS are normally unlikely to show this as they dispatch READ ops asynchronously, which allows the ZERO-subreq to finish first. 9P's READ op is completely synchronous, so the ZERO-subreq will always happen after. It isn't seen all the time, though, because the collection may be done in a worker thread.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
36(Track)
EG Risk 36/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 14, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 31, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfs: Fix early read unlock of page with EOF in middle - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b5482c0e5ee740b35a70759d3582477aea8e8e4
generic

netfs: Fix early read unlock of page with EOF in middle - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/570ad253a3455a520f03c2136af8714bc780186d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-71201(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-124.8.1.el10_12025-11-11redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.18.6osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (93 versions)6.18.8-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 158 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-14 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-14 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-14 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-14 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-14 10:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-13 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-13 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-13 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-11 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-11 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-11 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-10 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-10 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-09 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-09 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-09 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-08 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-08 10:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-07 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-07 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-06 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-06 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-05 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-02 20:36 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-02 20:36 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-02 20:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-07-30 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-07-30 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-07-30 06:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-23 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-17 14:29 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-29 13:02 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-71201?
CVE-2025-71201 is a high vulnerability published on February 14, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix early read unlock of page with EOF in middle The read result collection for buffered reads seems to run ahead of the completion of subrequests under some circumstances, as can be seen in the following log snippet:…
When was CVE-2025-71201 disclosed?
CVE-2025-71201 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 14, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-71201 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-71201 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-71201?
CVE-2025-71201 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-71201?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-71201, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-71201

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-71201?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.