In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: xilinx: xdma: Fix regmap max_register
The max_register field is assigned the size of the register memory
region instead of the offset of the last register.
The result is that reading from the regmap via debugfs can cause
a segmentation fault:
tail /sys/kernel/debug/regmap/xdma.1.auto/registers
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff800082f70000
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000007
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x07: level 3 translation fault
[...]
Call trace:
regmap_mmio_read32le+0x10/0x30
_regmap_bus_reg_read+0x74/0xc0
_regmap_read+0x68/0x198
regmap_read+0x54/0x88
regmap_read_debugfs+0x140/0x380
regmap_map_read_file+0x30/0x48
full_proxy_read+0x68/0xc8
vfs_read+0xcc/0x310
ksys_read+0x7c/0x120
__arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x40
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x64/0x108
do_el0_svc+0xb0/0xd8
el0_svc+0x38/0x130
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x138
el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
Code: aa1e03e9 d503201f f9400000 8b214000 (b9400000)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
note: tail[1217] exited with irqs disabled
note: tail[1217] exited with preempt_count 1
Segmentation fault
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it