In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
usb: gadget: f_eem: Fix memory leak in eem_unwrap
The existing code did not handle the failure case of usb_ep_queue in the
command path, potentially leading to memory leaks.
Improve error handling to free all allocated resources on usb_ep_queue
failure. This patch continues to use goto logic for error handling, as the
existing error handling is complex and not easily adaptable to auto-cleanup
helpers.
kmemleak results:
unreferenced object 0xffffff895a512300 (size 240):
backtrace:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0xbc/0x3a4
kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b4/0x358
skb_clone+0x90/0xd8
eem_unwrap+0x1cc/0x36c
unreferenced object 0xffffff8a157f4000 (size 256):
backtrace:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0xbc/0x3a4
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b4/0x2dc
kmalloc_trace+0x48/0x140
dwc3_gadget_ep_alloc_request+0x58/0x11c
usb_ep_alloc_request+0x40/0xe4
eem_unwrap+0x204/0x36c
unreferenced object 0xffffff8aadbaac00 (size 128):
backtrace:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0xbc/0x3a4
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b4/0x2dc
__kmalloc+0x64/0x1a8
eem_unwrap+0x218/0x36c
unreferenced object 0xffffff89ccef3500 (size 64):
backtrace:
slab_post_alloc_hook+0xbc/0x3a4
__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b4/0x2dc
kmalloc_trace+0x48/0x140
eem_unwrap+0x238/0x36c
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it