CVE-2025-40250

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-12-04. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure

The mlx5_irq_alloc() function can inadvertently free the entire rmap and end up in a crash[1] when the other threads tries to access this, when request_irq() fails due to exhausted IRQ vectors. This commit modifies the cleanup to remove only the specific IRQ mapping that was just added.

This prevents removal of other valid mappings and ensures precise cleanup of the failed IRQ allocation's associated glue object.

Note: This error is observed when both fwctl and rds configs are enabled.

[1] mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to request irq. err = -28 infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while trying to test write-combining support mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to request irq. err = -28 infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while trying to test write-combining support mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:03:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to request irq. err = -28 mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to request irq. err = -28 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe277a58fde16f291: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI

RIP: 0010:free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d Call Trace: ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9 ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9 ? mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xa ? die_addr+0x39/0x53 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c4/0x3e9 ? dev_vprintk_emit+0x5f/0x90 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x27 ? free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core] irq_pool_request_vector+0x7d/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5_irq_request+0x2e/0xe0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_irq_request_vector+0xad/0xf7 [mlx5_core] comp_irq_request_pci+0x64/0xf0 [mlx5_core] create_comp_eq+0x71/0x385 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_open_xdpsq+0x11c/0x230 [mlx5_core] mlx5_comp_eqn_get+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core] ? xas_load+0x8/0x91 mlx5_comp_irqn_get+0x40/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_channel+0x7d/0x3c7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_channels+0xad/0x250 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_locked+0x3e/0x110 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open+0x23/0x70 [mlx5_core] __dev_open+0xf1/0x1a5 __dev_change_flags+0x1e1/0x249 dev_change_flags+0x21/0x5c do_setlink+0x28b/0xcc4 ? __nla_parse+0x22/0x3d ? inet6_validate_link_af+0x6b/0x108 ? cpumask_next+0x1f/0x35 ? __snmp6_fill_stats64.constprop.0+0x66/0x107 ? __nla_validate_parse+0x48/0x1e6 __rtnl_newlink+0x5ff/0xa57 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x164/0x2ce rtnl_newlink+0x44/0x6e rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2bb/0x362 ? __netlink_sendskb+0x4c/0x6c ? netlink_unicast+0x28f/0x2ce ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x150/0x146 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5f/0x112 netlink_unicast+0x213/0x2ce netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d9 __sock_sendmsg+0x65/0x6a ____sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2c9 ? import_iovec+0x17/0x2b ___sys_sendmsg+0x97/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x81/0xd8 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x87 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0 RIP: 0033:0x7fc328603727 Code: c3 66 90 41 54 41 89 d4 55 48 89 f5 53 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 0b ed ff ff 44 89 e2 48 89 ee 89 df 41 89 c0 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 35 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 44 ed ff ff 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe8eb3f1a0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007fc328603727 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 RDI: 000000000000000d RBP: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00000000000 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 4, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 31, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d47515af6cccd7484d8b0870376858c9848a18ec
generic

net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ebd02cf2dde11b86f89ea4c9f55179eab30d4ee
generic

net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/69e043bce09c9a77e5f55b9ac7505874a2a1a9f0
generic

net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d6b4bea8b80bfa13c903ba547538249e7c5e977

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-40250(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(17)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(17)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 138 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-05 12:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-05 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-05 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  11. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-30 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-30 06:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-27 06:09 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-10 00:47 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 11:31 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 03:39 UTCOSV refresh
  74. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-40250?
CVE-2025-40250 is a high vulnerability published on December 4, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure The mlx5irqalloc() function can inadvertently free the entire rmap and end up in a crash[1] when the other threads tries to access this, when request_irq() fails due to…
When was CVE-2025-40250 disclosed?
CVE-2025-40250 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 4, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-40250 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-40250 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-40250?
CVE-2025-40250 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-40250?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-40250, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-40250

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-40250?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.