CVE-2025-40040

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2025-36488 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3q4f-fwrg-cw4x (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise

syzkaller discovered the following crash: (kernel BUG)

[ 44.607039] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 44.607422] kernel BUG at mm/userfaultfd.c:2067! [ 44.608148] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI [ 44.608814] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2475 Comm: reproducer Not tainted 6.16.0-rc6 #1 PREEMPT(none) [ 44.609635] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 44.610695] RIP: 0010:userfaultfd_release_all+0x3a8/0x460

[ 44.617726] Call Trace: [ 44.617926] [ 44.619284] userfaultfd_release+0xef/0x1b0 [ 44.620976] __fput+0x3f9/0xb60 [ 44.621240] fput_close_sync+0x110/0x210 [ 44.622222] __x64_sys_close+0x8f/0x120 [ 44.622530] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x2f0 [ 44.622840] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 44.623244] RIP: 0033:0x7f365bb3f227

Kernel panics because it detects UFFD inconsistency during userfaultfd_release_all(). Specifically, a VMA which has a valid pointer to vma->vm_userfaultfd_ctx, but no UFFD flags in vma->vm_flags.

The inconsistency is caused in ksm_madvise(): when user calls madvise() with MADV_UNMEARGEABLE on a VMA that is registered for UFFD in MINOR mode, it accidentally clears all flags stored in the upper 32 bits of vma->vm_flags.

Assuming x86_64 kernel build, unsigned long is 64-bit and unsigned int and int are 32-bit wide. This setup causes the following mishap during the &= ~VM_MERGEABLE assignment.

VM_MERGEABLE is a 32-bit constant of type unsigned int, 0x8000'0000. After ~ is applied, it becomes 0x7fff'ffff unsigned int, which is then promoted to unsigned long before the & operation. This promotion fills upper 32 bits with leading 0s, as we're doing unsigned conversion (and even for a signed conversion, this wouldn't help as the leading bit is 0). & operation thus ends up AND-ing vm_flags with 0x0000'0000'7fff'ffff instead of intended 0xffff'ffff'7fff'ffff and hence accidentally clears the upper 32-bits of its value.

Fix it by changing VM_MERGEABLE constant to unsigned long, using the BIT() macro.

Note: other VM_* flags are not affected: This only happens to the VM_MERGEABLE flag, as the other VM_* flags are all constants of type int and after ~ operation, they end up with leading 1 and are thus converted to unsigned long with leading 1s.

Note 2: After commit 31defc3b01d9 ("userfaultfd: remove (VM_)BUG_ON()s"), this is no longer a kernel BUG, but a WARNING at the same place:

[ 45.595973] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2474 at mm/userfaultfd.c:2067

but the root-cause (flag-drop) remains the same.

[[email protected]: rust bindgen wasn't able to handle BIT(), from Miguel]

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
31st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 28, 2025

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f04aad36a07cc17b7a5d5b9a2d386ce6fae63e93
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b69f19244c2b6475c8a6eb72f0fb0d53509e48cd
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac50c6e0a8f91a02b681af81abb2362fbb67cc18
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92b82e232b8d8b116ac6e57aeae7a6033db92c60
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/850f1ea245bdc0ce6a3fd36bfb80d8cf9647cb71
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/788e5385d0ff69cdba1cabccb9dab8d9647b9239
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76385629f45740b7888f8fcd83bde955b10f61fe
Web page

mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/41cb9fd904fe0c39d52e82dd84dc3c96b7aa9693

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-40040(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.153-1~deb11u1 (12 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.158-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.158-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (44 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.158-1: fixed in 6.1.158-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.57-1~bpo12+1 (6 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.57-1: fixed in 6.12.57-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.17.5-1~exp1 (75 versions)
  • every version up to 6.17.6-1: fixed in 6.17.6-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 204 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 106 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  5. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  6. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 13:25 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  14. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  15. 2026-10-25 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  17. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-19 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-19 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q4f-fwrg-cw4x · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  24. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-18 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  3. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  4. 2026-10-15 23:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-15 23:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q4f-fwrg-cw4x · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  11. 2026-10-11 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  16. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  26. 2026-09-27 02:12 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
  29. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 25th percentile
  30. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  31. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  32. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  33. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  36. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  37. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  38. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  40. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  41. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  42. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  43. 2026-09-07 11:18 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  45. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  46. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  47. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  49. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  51. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  52. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  53. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  54. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  55. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 20:31 UTCOSV refresh
  59. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  60. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  61. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  64. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  65. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  66. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  69. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  70. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  71. 2026-08-05 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-05 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-05 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3q4f-fwrg-cw4x · GitHub CVSS 5.5

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCSpiralBL0CK/CVE-2023-1206-CVE-2025-40040-CVE-2024-49882
    Published Dec 1, 2025

    3 linux kernel bugs chains to do secure comm app using side channel to establish key and establish covert channe;

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-40040?
CVE-2025-40040 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 28, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/ksm: fix flag-dropping behavior in ksm_madvise syzkaller discovered the following crash: (kernel BUG) [ 44.607039] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 44.607422] kernel BUG at mm/userfaultfd.c:2067! [ 44.608148] Oops: invalid…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-40040 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-40040 was published on October 28, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-40040 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-40040 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-40040?
CVE-2025-40040 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-40040?
A fix for CVE-2025-40040 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-40040 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-40040

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-40040?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.