In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/smc: fix warning in smc_rx_splice() when calling get_page()
smc_lo_register_dmb() allocates DMB buffers with kzalloc(), which are
later passed to get_page() in smc_rx_splice(). Since kmalloc memory is
not page-backed, this triggers WARN_ON_ONCE() in get_page() and prevents
holding a refcount on the buffer. This can lead to use-after-free if
the memory is released before splice_to_pipe() completes.
Use folio_alloc() instead, ensuring DMBs are page-backed and safe for
get_page().
WARNING: CPU: 18 PID: 12152 at ./include/linux/mm.h:1330 smc_rx_splice+0xaf8/0xe20 [smc]
CPU: 18 UID: 0 PID: 12152 Comm: smcapp Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc3-11705-g9cf4672ecfee #10 NONE
Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 704 (z/VM 7.4.0)
Krnl PSW : 0704e00180000000 000793161032696c (smc_rx_splice+0xafc/0xe20 [smc])
R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:2 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
Krnl GPRS: 0000000000000000 001cee80007d3001 00077400000000f8 0000000000000005
0000000000000001 001cee80007d3006 0007740000001000 001c000000000000
000000009b0c99e0 0000000000001000 001c0000000000f8 001c000000000000
000003ffcc6f7c88 0007740003e98000 0007931600000005 000792969b2ff7b8
Krnl Code: 0007931610326960: af000000 mc 0,0
0007931610326964: a7f4ff43 brc 15,00079316103267ea
#0007931610326968: af000000 mc 0,0
>000793161032696c: a7f4ff3f brc 15,00079316103267ea
0007931610326970: e320f1000004 lg %r2,256(%r15)
0007931610326976: c0e53fd1b5f5 brasl %r14,000793168fd5d560
000793161032697c: a7f4fbb5 brc 15,00079316103260e6
0007931610326980: b904002b lgr %r2,%r11
Call Trace:
smc_rx_splice+0xafc/0xe20 [smc]
smc_rx_splice+0x756/0xe20 [smc])
smc_rx_recvmsg+0xa74/0xe00 [smc]
smc_splice_read+0x1ce/0x3b0 [smc]
sock_splice_read+0xa2/0xf0
do_splice_read+0x198/0x240
splice_file_to_pipe+0x7e/0x110
do_splice+0x59e/0xde0
__do_splice+0x11a/0x2d0
__s390x_sys_splice+0x140/0x1f0
__do_syscall+0x122/0x280
system_call+0x6e/0x90
Last Breaking-Event-Address:
smc_rx_splice+0x960/0xe20 [smc]
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-03). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it