In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
qed: Don't collect too many protection override GRC elements
In the protection override dump path, the firmware can return far too
many GRC elements, resulting in attempting to write past the end of the
previously-kmalloc'ed dump buffer.
This will result in a kernel panic with reason:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ADDRESS
where "ADDRESS" is just past the end of the protection override dump
buffer. The start address of the buffer is:
p_hwfn->cdev->dbg_features[DBG_FEATURE_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE].dump_buf
and the size of the buffer is buf_size in the same data structure.
The panic can be arrived at from either the qede Ethernet driver path:
[exception RIP: qed_grc_dump_addr_range+0x108]
qed_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc02662ed [qed]
qed_dbg_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc0267792 [qed]
qed_dbg_feature at ffffffffc026aa8f [qed]
qed_dbg_all_data at ffffffffc026b211 [qed]
qed_fw_fatal_reporter_dump at ffffffffc027298a [qed]
devlink_health_do_dump at ffffffff82497f61
devlink_health_report at ffffffff8249cf29
qed_report_fatal_error at ffffffffc0272baf [qed]
qede_sp_task at ffffffffc045ed32 [qede]
process_one_work at ffffffff81d19783
or the qedf storage driver path:
[exception RIP: qed_grc_dump_addr_range+0x108]
qed_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc068b2ed [qed]
qed_dbg_protection_override_dump at ffffffffc068c792 [qed]
qed_dbg_feature at ffffffffc068fa8f [qed]
qed_dbg_all_data at ffffffffc0690211 [qed]
qed_fw_fatal_reporter_dump at ffffffffc069798a [qed]
devlink_health_do_dump at ffffffff8aa95e51
devlink_health_report at ffffffff8aa9ae19
qed_report_fatal_error at ffffffffc0697baf [qed]
qed_hw_err_notify at ffffffffc06d32d7 [qed]
qed_spq_post at ffffffffc06b1011 [qed]
qed_fcoe_destroy_conn at ffffffffc06b2e91 [qed]
qedf_cleanup_fcport at ffffffffc05e7597 [qedf]
qedf_rport_event_handler at ffffffffc05e7bf7 [qedf]
fc_rport_work at ffffffffc02da715 [libfc]
process_one_work at ffffffff8a319663
Resolve this by clamping the firmware's return value to the maximum
number of legal elements the firmware should return.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it