In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: avoid overlapping mappings on ECC buffer
Avoid below overlapping mappings by using a contiguous
non-cacheable buffer.
[ 4.077708] DMA-API: stm32_fmc2_nfc 48810000.nand-controller: cacheline tracking EEXIST,
overlapping mappings aren't supported
[ 4.089103] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 44 at kernel/dma/debug.c:568 add_dma_entry+0x23c/0x300
[ 4.097071] Modules linked in:
[ 4.100101] CPU: 1 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 6.1.82 #1
[ 4.106346] Hardware name: STMicroelectronics STM32MP257F VALID1 SNOR / MB1704 (LPDDR4 Power discrete) + MB1703 + MB1708 (SNOR MB1730) (DT)
[ 4.118824] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[ 4.124674] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 4.131624] pc : add_dma_entry+0x23c/0x300
[ 4.135658] lr : add_dma_entry+0x23c/0x300
[ 4.139792] sp : ffff800009dbb490
[ 4.143016] x29: ffff800009dbb4a0 x28: 0000000004008022 x27: ffff8000098a6000
[ 4.150174] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff8000099e7000 x24: ffff8000099e7de8
[ 4.157231] x23: 00000000ffffffff x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff8000098a6a20
[ 4.164388] x20: ffff000080964180 x19: ffff800009819ba0 x18: 0000000000000006
[ 4.171545] x17: 6361727420656e69 x16: 6c6568636163203a x15: 72656c6c6f72746e
[ 4.178602] x14: 6f632d646e616e2e x13: ffff800009832f58 x12: 00000000000004ec
[ 4.185759] x11: 00000000000001a4 x10: ffff80000988af58 x9 : ffff800009832f58
[ 4.192916] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff80000988af58 x6 : 80000000fffff000
[ 4.199972] x5 : 000000000000bff4 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
[ 4.207128] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff0000812d2c40
[ 4.214185] Call trace:
[ 4.216605] add_dma_entry+0x23c/0x300
[ 4.220338] debug_dma_map_sg+0x198/0x350
[ 4.224373] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xa0/0x110
[ 4.228411] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x2c
[ 4.232247] stm32_fmc2_nfc_xfer.isra.0+0x1c8/0x3fc
[ 4.237088] stm32_fmc2_nfc_seq_read_page+0xc8/0x174
[ 4.242127] nand_read_oob+0x1d4/0x8e0
[ 4.245861] mtd_read_oob_std+0x58/0x84
[ 4.249596] mtd_read_oob+0x90/0x150
[ 4.253231] mtd_read+0x68/0xac
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it