CVE-2025-39758

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-11. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages

Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline do_tcp_sendpages()"), we have been doing this:

static int siw_tcp_sendpages(struct socket *s, struct page **page, int offset, size_t size) [...] /* Calculate the number of bytes we need to push, for this page * specifically */ size_t bytes = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset, size); /* If we can't splice it, then copy it in, as normal */ if (!sendpage_ok(page[i])) msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_SPLICE_PAGES; /* Set the bvec pointing to the page, with len $bytes */ bvec_set_page(&bvec, page[i], bytes, offset); /* Set the iter to $size, aka the size of the whole sendpages (!!!) */ iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, &bvec, 1, size); try_page_again: lock_sock(sk); /* Sendmsg with $size size (!!!) */ rv = tcp_sendmsg_locked(sk, &msg, size);

This means we've been sending oversized iov_iters and tcp_sendmsg calls for a while. This has a been a benign bug because sendpage_ok() always returned true. With the recent slab allocator changes being slowly introduced into next (that disallow sendpage on large kmalloc allocations), we have recently hit out-of-bounds crashes, due to slight differences in iov_iter behavior between the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES and "regular" copy paths:

(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) skb_splice_from_iter iov_iter_extract_pages iov_iter_extract_bvec_pages uses i->nr_segs to correctly stop in its tracks before OoB'ing everywhere skb_splice_from_iter gets a "short" read

(!MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) skb_copy_to_page_nocache copy=iov_iter_count [...] copy_from_iter /* this doesn't help */ if (unlikely(iter->count < len)) len = iter->count; iterate_bvec ... and we run off the bvecs

Fix this by properly setting the iov_iter's byte count, plus sending the correct byte count to tcp_sendmsg_locked.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
28%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 11, 2025

Last Modified

July 30, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-39758(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(17)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-30 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-30 06:53 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-30 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh
  13. 2026-07-23 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 14:41 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 03:05 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-29 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-05-29 23:01 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-39758?
CVE-2025-39758 is a medium vulnerability published on September 11, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siwtcpsendpages Ever since commit c2ff29e99a76 ("siw: Inline dotcpsendpages()"), we have been doing this: static int siwtcpsendpages(struct socket s, struct page *page, int offset, size_t…
When was CVE-2025-39758 disclosed?
CVE-2025-39758 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 11, 2025, with the most recent update on July 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-39758 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-39758 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 71.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-39758?
CVE-2025-39758 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-39758?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-39758, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-39758

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-39758?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.