CVE-2025-38166

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-07-03. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: fix ktls panic with sockmap

[ 2172.936997] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2172.936999] kernel BUG at lib/iov_iter.c:629! ...... [ 2172.944996] PKRU: 55555554 [ 2172.945155] Call Trace: [ 2172.945299] [ 2172.945428] ? die+0x36/0x90 [ 2172.945601] ? do_trap+0xdd/0x100 [ 2172.945795] ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180 [ 2172.946031] ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180 [ 2172.946267] ? do_error_trap+0x7d/0x110 [ 2172.946499] ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180 [ 2172.946736] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 [ 2172.946961] ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180 [ 2172.947197] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 2172.947446] ? iov_iter_revert+0x178/0x180 [ 2172.947683] ? iov_iter_revert+0x5c/0x180 [ 2172.947913] tls_sw_sendmsg_locked.isra.0+0x794/0x840 [ 2172.948206] tls_sw_sendmsg+0x52/0x80 [ 2172.948420] ? inet_sendmsg+0x1f/0x70 [ 2172.948634] __sys_sendto+0x1cd/0x200 [ 2172.948848] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 2172.949072] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x140/0x270 [ 2172.949330] ? __lock_release.isra.0+0x5e/0x170 [ 2172.949595] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 [ 2172.949817] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x140/0x270 [ 2172.950211] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xda/0x190 [ 2172.950632] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xc2/0xd0 [ 2172.951036] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 2172.951382] do_syscall_64+0x90/0x170 ......

After calling bpf_exec_tx_verdict(), the size of msg_pl->sg may increase, e.g., when the BPF program executes bpf_msg_push_data().

If the BPF program sets cork_bytes and sg.size is smaller than cork_bytes, it will return -ENOSPC and attempt to roll back to the non-zero copy logic. However, during rollback, msg->msg_iter is reset, but since msg_pl->sg.size has been increased, subsequent executions will exceed the actual size of msg_iter. ''' iov_iter_revert(&msg->msg_iter, msg_pl->sg.size - orig_size); '''

The changes in this commit are based on the following considerations:

  • When cork_bytes is set, rolling back to non-zero copy logic is
pointless and can directly go to zero-copy logic.
  • We can not calculate the correct number of bytes to revert msg_iter.

Assume the original data is "abcdefgh" (8 bytes), and after 3 pushes by the BPF program, it becomes 11-byte data: "abc?de?fgh?". Then, we set cork_bytes to 6, which means the first 6 bytes have been processed, and the remaining 5 bytes "?fgh?" will be cached until the length meets the cork_bytes requirement.

However, some data in "?fgh?" is not within 'sg->msg_iter' (but in msg_pl instead), especially the data "?" we pushed.

So it doesn't seem as simple as just reverting through an offset of msg_iter.

  • For non-TLS sockets in tcp_bpf_sendmsg, when a "cork" situation occurs,
the user-space send() doesn't return an error, and the returned length is the same as the input length parameter, even if some data is cached.

Additionally, I saw that the current non-zero-copy logic for handling corking is written as: ''' line 1177 else if (ret != -EAGAIN) { if (ret == -ENOSPC) ret = 0; goto send_end; '''

So it's ok to just return 'copied' without error when a "cork" situation occurs.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
4.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 3, 2025

Last Modified

December 18, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-38166(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(25)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.49.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.52+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1046.52) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1023.24) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1044.44~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1051.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-32.32~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-32.32) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.14 (6.14.0-1012.12) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-6.14 (6.14.0-1012.12) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-1012.12~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.14.0-1013.13~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.14 (6.14.0-1014.14) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1041.42~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1047.50~22.04.2) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1041.42) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1047.50+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1043.44) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1043.48) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.5.1.el9_82026-05-19redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.7.1.el10_22026-05-19redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(23)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 20:04 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 49 more
  1. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-18 08:35 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-30 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-05-30 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-05-30 02:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-38166?
CVE-2025-38166 is a medium vulnerability published on July 3, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: fix ktls panic with sockmap [ 2172.936997] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2172.936999] kernel BUG at lib/iov_iter.c:629! ...... [ 2172.944996] PKRU: 55555554 [ 2172.945155] Call Trace: [ 2172.945299] <TASK> […
When was CVE-2025-38166 disclosed?
CVE-2025-38166 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 3, 2025, with the most recent update on December 18, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-38166 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-38166 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-38166?
CVE-2025-38166 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-38166?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-38166, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-38166

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-38166?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.