CVE-2025-38016

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-06-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

HID: bpf: abort dispatch if device destroyed

The current HID bpf implementation assumes no output report/request will go through it after hid_bpf_destroy_device() has been called. This leads to a bug that unplugging certain types of HID devices causes a cleaned- up SRCU to be accessed. The bug was previously a hidden failure until a recent x86 percpu change [1] made it access not-present pages.

The bug will be triggered if the conditions below are met:

A) a device under the driver has some LEDs on B) hid_ll_driver->request() is uninplemented (e.g., logitech-djreceiver)

If condition A is met, hidinput_led_worker() is always scheduled *after* hid_bpf_destroy_device().

hid_destroy_device hid_bpf_destroy_device cleanup_srcu_struct(&hdev->bpf.srcu) hid_remove_device ... led_classdev_unregister led_trigger_set(led_cdev, NULL) led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF) ... input_inject_event input_event_dispose hidinput_input_event schedule_work(&hid->led_work) [hidinput_led_worker]

This is fine when condition B is not met, where hidinput_led_worker() calls hid_ll_driver->request(). This is the case for most HID drivers, which implement it or use the generic one from usbhid. The driver itself or an underlying driver will then abort processing the request.

Otherwise, hidinput_led_worker() tries hid_hw_output_report() and leads to the bug.

hidinput_led_worker hid_hw_output_report dispatch_hid_bpf_output_report srcu_read_lock(&hdev->bpf.srcu) srcu_read_unlock(&hdev->bpf.srcu, idx)

The bug has existed since the introduction [2] of dispatch_hid_bpf_output_report(). However, the same bug also exists in dispatch_hid_bpf_raw_requests(), and I've reproduced (no visible effect because of the lack of [1], but confirmed bpf.destroyed == 1) the bug against the commit (i.e., the Fixes:) introducing the function. This is because hidinput_led_worker() falls back to hid_hw_raw_request() when hid_ll_driver->output_report() is uninplemented (e.g., logitech- djreceiver).

hidinput_led_worker hid_hw_output_report: -ENOSYS hid_hw_raw_request dispatch_hid_bpf_raw_requests srcu_read_lock(&hdev->bpf.srcu) ` srcu_read_unlock(&hdev->bpf.srcu, idx)

Fix the issue by returning early in the two mentioned functions if hid_bpf has been marked as destroyed. Though dispatch_hid_bpf_device_event() handles input events, and there is no evidence that it may be called after the destruction, the same check, as a safety net, is also added to it to maintain the consistency among all dispatch functions.

The impact of the bug on other architectures is unclear. Even if it acts as a hidden failure, this is still dangerous because it corrupts whatever is on the address calculated by SRCU. Thus, CC'ing the stable list.

[1]: commit 9d7de2aa8b41 ("x86/percpu/64: Use relative percpu offsets") [2]: commit 9286675a2aed ("HID: bpf: add HID-BPF hooks for hid_hw_output_report")

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
13%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 18, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

HID: bpf: abort dispatch if device destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8544be7e8e55b0ef23e1ab90e23e8d4d4aad3d3
generic

HID: bpf: abort dispatch if device destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4b4fe25a4101d1ddb5884f40e149a3618983b66
generic

HID: bpf: abort dispatch if device destroyed - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/578e1b96fad7402ff7e9c7648c8f1ad0225147c8

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.14.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-6.14 (6.14.0-1010.10) @ plucky2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-28.28~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.12.30osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 108 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-05 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-30 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-30 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 03:11 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-07-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 22:45 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 09:43 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-38016?
CVE-2025-38016 is a medium vulnerability published on June 18, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: bpf: abort dispatch if device destroyed The current HID bpf implementation assumes no output report/request will go through it after hidbpfdestroy_device() has been called. This leads to a bug that unplugging certain types of…
When was CVE-2025-38016 disclosed?
CVE-2025-38016 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 18, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-38016 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-38016 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 86.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-38016?
CVE-2025-38016 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-38016?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-38016, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-38016

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-38016?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.