In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add missing locking
Recent kernels complain about a missing lock in k3-udma.c when the lock
validator is enabled:
[ 4.128073] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 746 at drivers/dma/ti/../virt-dma.h:169 udma_start.isra.0+0x34/0x238
[ 4.137352] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 746 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted 6.12.9-arm64 #28
[ 4.144867] Hardware name: pp-v12 (DT)
[ 4.148648] Workqueue: events udma_check_tx_completion
[ 4.153841] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 4.160834] pc : udma_start.isra.0+0x34/0x238
[ 4.165227] lr : udma_start.isra.0+0x30/0x238
[ 4.169618] sp : ffffffc083cabcf0
[ 4.172963] x29: ffffffc083cabcf0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffffff800001b005
[ 4.180167] x26: ffffffc0812f0000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 4.187370] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: 00000000e21eabe9 x21: ffffff8000fa0670
[ 4.194571] x20: ffffff8001b6bf00 x19: ffffff8000fa0430 x18: ffffffc083b95030
[ 4.201773] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000f0000000 x15: 0000000000000048
[ 4.208976] x14: 0000000000000048 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001
[ 4.216179] x11: ffffffc08151a240 x10: 0000000000003ea1 x9 : ffffffc08046ab68
[ 4.223381] x8 : ffffffc083cabac0 x7 : ffffffc081df3718 x6 : 0000000000029fc8
[ 4.230583] x5 : ffffffc0817ee6d8 x4 : 0000000000000bc0 x3 : 0000000000000000
[ 4.237784] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 00000000001fffff x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 4.244986] Call trace:
[ 4.247463] udma_start.isra.0+0x34/0x238
[ 4.251509] udma_check_tx_completion+0xd0/0xdc
[ 4.256076] process_one_work+0x244/0x3fc
[ 4.260129] process_scheduled_works+0x6c/0x74
[ 4.264610] worker_thread+0x150/0x1dc
[ 4.268398] kthread+0xd8/0xe8
[ 4.271492] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 4.275107] irq event stamp: 220
[ 4.278363] hardirqs last enabled at (219): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x38/0x50
[ 4.287183] hardirqs last disabled at (220): [] el1_dbg+0x24/0x50
[ 4.294879] softirqs last enabled at (182): [] handle_softirqs+0x1c0/0x3cc
[ 4.303437] softirqs last disabled at (177): [] __do_softirq+0x1c/0x28
[ 4.311559] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
This commit adds the missing locking.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it