CVE-2025-37871

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-09. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall

A deadlock warning occurred when invoking nfs4_put_stid following a failed dl_recall queue operation: T1 T2 nfs4_laundromat nfs4_get_client_reaplist nfs4_anylock_blockers __break_lease spin_lock // ctx->flc_lock spin_lock // clp->cl_lock nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers locks_owner_has_blockers spin_lock // flctx->flc_lock nfsd_break_deleg_cb nfsd_break_one_deleg nfs4_put_stid refcount_dec_and_lock spin_lock // clp->cl_lock

When a file is opened, an nfs4_delegation is allocated with sc_count initialized to 1, and the file_lease holds a reference to the delegation. The file_lease is then associated with the file through kernel_setlease.

The disassociation is performed in nfsd4_delegreturn via the following call chain: nfsd4_delegreturn --> destroy_delegation --> destroy_unhashed_deleg --> nfs4_unlock_deleg_lease --> kernel_setlease --> generic_delete_lease The corresponding sc_count reference will be released after this disassociation.

Since nfsd_break_one_deleg executes while holding the flc_lock, the disassociation process becomes blocked when attempting to acquire flc_lock in generic_delete_lease. This means: 1) sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg will not be decremented to 0; 2) The nfs4_put_stid called by nfsd_break_one_deleg will not attempt to acquire cl_lock; 3) Consequently, no deadlock condition is created.

Given that sc_count in nfsd_break_one_deleg remains non-zero, we can safely perform refcount_dec on sc_count directly. This approach effectively avoids triggering deadlock warnings.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
30(Track)
EG Risk 30/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
50%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 9, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
generic Patch Available

[SECURITY] [DLA 4193-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html
generic Patch Available

[SECURITY] [DLA 4178-1] linux security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00030.html
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba903539fff745d592d893c71b30e5e268a95413
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9bbe8f9d5663311d06667ce36d6ed255ead1a26
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7fce086f6ca84db409b9d58493ea77c1978897c
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a70832d3555987035fc430ccd703acd89393eadb
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1d14d931bf700c1025db8c46d6731aa5cf440f9
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d192e27a431026c58d60edf66dc6cd98d0c01fc
generic

nfsd: decrease sc_count directly if fail to queue dl_recall - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14985d66b9b99c12995dd99d1c6c8dec4114c2a5

Patch Availability(26)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.144.141) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1088.92) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1087.77) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1052.56) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm-5.15 (5.15.0.1084.80) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1083.81) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1094.92) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1094.103~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1094.79) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1041.42~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1047.50~22.04.2) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1041.42) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1043.44) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-100.100+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1047.50+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1043.48) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-100.100.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.49.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1044.44) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1023.24) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1046.52) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1046.52+fips1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1051.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 5.10.237osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 109 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-05 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-05 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-30 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-30 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-24 06:41 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 01:51 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-18 13:05 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37871?
CVE-2025-37871 is a medium vulnerability published on May 9, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: decrease sccount directly if fail to queue dlrecall A deadlock warning occurred when invoking nfs4putstid following a failed dl_recall queue operation: T1 T2 nfs4_laundromat nfs4getclient_reaplist nfs4anylockblockers…
When was CVE-2025-37871 disclosed?
CVE-2025-37871 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 9, 2025, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-37871 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37871 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 50.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37871?
CVE-2025-37871 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37871?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-37871, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-37871

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37871?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.