CrushFTP 10 before 10.8.4 and 11 before 11.3.1 allows authentication bypass and takeover of the crushadmin account (unless a DMZ proxy instance is used), as exploited in the wild in March and April 2025, aka "Unauthenticated HTTP(S) port access." A race condition exists in the AWS4-HMAC (compatible with S3) authorization method of the HTTP component of the FTP server. The server first verifies the existence of the user by performing a call to login_user_pass() with no password requirement. This will authenticate the session through the HMAC verification process and up until the server checks for user verification once more. The vulnerability can be further stabilized, eliminating the need for successfully triggering a race condition, by sending a mangled AWS4-HMAC header. By providing only the username and a following slash (/), the server will successfully find a username, which triggers the successful anypass authentication process, but the server will fail to find the expected SignedHeaders entry, resulting in an index-out-of-bounds error that stops the code from reaching the session cleanup. Together, these issues make it trivial to authenticate as any known or guessable user (e.g., crushadmin), and can lead to a full compromise of the system by obtaining an administrative account.
CVE-2025-31161
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-04-07), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2025-9910 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (MITRE Corporation) lists CrushFTP versions 10 up to but not including 10.8.4 and 11 up to but not including 11.3.1 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- >99.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- >99.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.crushftp.com/crush11wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Update · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31161
Published
April 3, 2025
Last Modified
October 31, 2025
Advisory Details (10)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-31161CVE-2025-31161: Mitigate CrushFTP Vulnerability - vsociety
https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-31161-mitigate-crushftp-vulnerabilityCVE-2025-31161: Detect CrushFTP Vulnerability - vsociety
https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-31161-detect-crushftp-vulnerabilityCrushFTP Vulnerability Exploited Following Disclosure Issues - Infosecurity Magazine
https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/crushftp-flaw-exploited-disclosure/CrushFTP CVE-2025-31161 Auth Bypass and Post-Exploitation | Huntress
https://www.huntress.com/blog/crushftp-cve-2025-31161-auth-bypass-and-post-exploitationDisclosure Drama Clouds CrushFTP Vulnerability Exploitation
https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-threats/disclosure-drama-clouds-crushftp-vulnerability-exploitationCrushFTP Authentication Bypass - CVE-2025-2825 — ProjectDiscovery Blog
https://projectdiscovery.io/blog/crushftp-authentication-bypassRapid7 Analysis: CVE-2025-2825
https://attackerkb.com/topics/k0EgiL9Psz/cve-2025-2825/rapid7-analysisCrush11wiki: Update
https://crushftp.com/crush11wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Update#section-Update-VulnerabilityInfoCrushFTP auth bypass vulnerability: Disclosure mess & attacks
https://outpost24.com/blog/crushftp-auth-bypass-vulnerability/Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 104× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 929 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 829 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 23:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 10:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 12:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 08:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-23 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 17:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 04:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 10:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 02:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 14:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 01:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS >99.9% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 08:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-c57h-rx24-vf52 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Publicly available exploits
(9 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 7 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCc4bsec/CVE-2025-31161Published Oct 21, 2025
- Open source ↗GitHub PoCcesarbtakeda/CVE-2025-31161Published Oct 21, 2025
- GitHub PoCf4dee-backup/CVE-2025-31161Published Sep 10, 2025
PoC CVE-2025-31161 - Authentication Bypass CrushFTP
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCibrahmsql/CVE-2025-31161Published Jun 15, 2025
CrushFTP 11.3.1 - Authentication Bypass
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoC0xgh057r3c0n/CVE-2025-31161Published May 23, 2025
🛡️ CVE-2025-31161 - CrushFTP User Creation Authentication Bypass Exploit
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52295Published May 18, 2025
CrushFTP 11.3.1 - Authentication Bypass
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-31161.yamlPublished Apr 22, 2025
CrushFTP - Authentication Bypass
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCTX-One/CVE-2025-31161Published Apr 21, 2025
CrushFTP CVE-2025-31161 Exploit Tool 🔓
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCImmersive-Labs-Sec/CVE-2025-31161Published Apr 8, 2025
Proof of Concept for CVE-2025-31161 / CVE-2025-2825
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2025-31161?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-31161 published?
Is CVE-2025-31161 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-31161?
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-31161?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-31161?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-31161
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-31161?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.