xml-crypto is an XML digital signature and encryption library for Node.js. An attacker may be able to exploit a vulnerability in versions prior to 6.0.1, 3.2.1, and 2.1.6 to bypass authentication or authorization mechanisms in systems that rely on xml-crypto for verifying signed XML documents. The vulnerability allows an attacker to modify a valid signed XML message in a way that still passes signature verification checks. For example, it could be used to alter critical identity or access control attributes, enabling an attacker with a valid account to escalate privileges or impersonate another user. Users of versions 6.0.0 and prior should upgrade to version 6.0.1 to receive a fix. Those who are still using v2.x or v3.x should upgrade to patched versions 2.1.6 or 3.2.1, respectively.
CVE-2025-29774
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 9.1% (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 73EG Risk 73/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity93% × 45%The EG Score, 9.3 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 9.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 95th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
March 14, 2025
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026SAMLStorm: Critical Authentication Bypass in xml-crypto and Node.js libraries — WorkOS
https://workos.com/blog/samlstormXML Signature Verification Bypass via Multiple SignedInfo References · Advisory · node-saml/xml-crypto · GitHub
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/security/advisories/GHSA-9p8x-f768-wp2gv6.0.1
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v6.0.1
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/releases/tag/v6.0.1v3.2.1
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v3.2.1
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/releases/tag/v3.2.1v2.1.6
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v2.1.6
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/releases/tag/v2.1.6commit 8ac6118ee797 (node-saml/xml-crypto)
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v6.0.1 (contains commit 8ac6118ee797)
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/commit/8ac6118ee7978b46aa56b82cbcaa5fca58c93a07commit 886dc63a8b4b (node-saml/xml-crypto)
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v2.1.6 (contains commit 886dc63a8b4b)
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/commit/886dc63a8b4bb5ae1db9f41c7854b171eb83aa98commit 28f92218ecbb (node-saml/xml-crypto)
Patch available: node-saml/xml-crypto v3.2.1 (contains commit 28f92218ecbb)
https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/commit/28f92218ecbb8dcbd238afa4efbbd50302aa9aedVendor Advisories for CVE-2025-29774(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1.4.3-1743652461 | 2025-04-03 | redhat |
| redhat | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1.5 | 2025-03-27 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| xml-crypto | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 90 of 194 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 10 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 104 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 17:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-14 11:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-13 11:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-12 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-10 22:47 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
Show 65 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-29 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-21 10:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-02 08:44 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 95th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 95th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.2% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-16 07:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.1% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-01 01:42 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 9.0% · 94th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoCdemining/Phantom-Signature-AttackPublished Jan 15, 2026
Phantom Signature Attack: An Analysis of the Critical Vulnerability CVE-2025-29774 in the Bitcoin Protocol, SIGHASH_SINGLE Implementation Flaws, and the Mathematical Framework for Private Key Recovery in Lost Cryptocurrency Wallets Enabling Unrestricted Control over BTC Assets
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCdemining/Digital-Signature-Forgery-AttackPublished Jul 23, 2025
How CVE-2025-29774 Vulnerabilities and the SIGHASH_SINGLE Bug Threaten Multi-Signature Wallet Operational Methods with Fake RawTX
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2025:3374
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-347
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-29774?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-29774 published?
Is CVE-2025-29774 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-29774?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-29774?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-29774
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-29774?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.