CVE-2025-24979

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: —CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

LF Edge eKuiper: SSRF in External Service

Summary

Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in eKuiper allows an attacker with permissions to register external services or create rules to induce the eKuiper server to make requests to unintended network locations, such as internal services, loopback interfaces (localhost), or cloud metadata endpoints.

Details

Prior to v2.4.0, eKuiper external service registrations and HTTP invocations did not validate destination IP addresses. An attacker with access to the eKuiper management API could register an external service pointing to an internal address (such as http://127.0.0.1:9081 or other internal network services) and trigger queries using service functions (e.g. SELECT tsschemaless(...) FROM demo). This allows probing internal networks, leaking sensitive information (such as internal endpoints/credentials), or interacting with internal APIs accessible to the eKuiper host.

PoC

  • Create an external service with an address pointing to an internal network / localhost:

{
  "interfaces": {
    "tsschemaless": {
      "address": "http://127.0.0.1:9081",
      "protocol": "rest",
      "options": {
        "insecureSkipVerify": true,
        "headers": {
          "Accept-Charset": "utf-8"
        }
      },
      "schemaless": true
    }
  }
}
  • Load it to eKuiper and create a rule invoking it, e.g.: SELECT tsschemaless("get", "/metadata/sources/yaml/mqtt", *) FROM demo.
  • Run the rule. When data flows through the stream, the response from the internal service is retrieved and can be routed to an external sink or inspected.

Impact

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allowing unauthorized access / probing of internal network services.

Remediation & Patches

  • Upgrade to eKuiper >= 2.4.0: Starting with v2.4.0, SSRF protection (httpx.GetSSRFDialContext) is enabled by default across HTTP clients, blocking requests to private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and unspecified IP addresses.

Workarounds (for versions < 2.4.0)

If unable to upgrade immediately:
  • Restrict Management API Access: Restrict access to the eKuiper REST API (port 9081) and CLI using network firewalls, reverse proxies, and authentication so only trusted administrators can create or update services and rules.
  • Egress Network Filtering: Use firewall / iptables rules or container network isolation to block outbound requests from eKuiper to private subnets, loopback addresses, and cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254).
  • Audit Service Definitions: Regularly review registered external services (GET /services or bin/kuiper show services) to verify target hosts.

Notes for Users Upgrading to >= 2.4.0

  • In v2.4.0 and later, basic.enablePrivateNet in kuiper.yaml defaults to false (blocking private network access).
  • If a developer's deployment legitimately requires eKuiper to communicate with internal REST services or private networks, they can explicitly opt in by setting basic.enablePrivateNet: true (or via environment variable KUIPER__BASIC__ENABLEPRIVATENET=true). Ensure eKuiper's API is protected before enabling this setting.

Reported by Alexey Kosmachev, Bi.Zone

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMlow confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
—
EPSS %ILE
—
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 9, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-24979(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper—
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
github.com/lf-edge/ekuiper/v2—
  • every version up to 2.4.0: fixed in 2.4.0
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-29 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-09 18:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2025-24979?
CVE-2025-24979 is a medium vulnerability published on September 9, 2026. LF Edge eKuiper: SSRF in External Service Summary Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in eKuiper allows an attacker with permissions to register external services or create rules to induce the eKuiper server to make requests to unintended network locations, such as internal services,…
When was CVE-2025-24979 disclosed?
CVE-2025-24979 was first published on September 9, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-24979?
CVE-2025-24979 has a CVSS base score of 5.5 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2025-24979?
A fix for CVE-2025-24979 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-24979 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-24979

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-24979?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.