CVE-2025-22111

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-04-16. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF.

SIOCBRDELIF is passed to dev_ioctl() first and later forwarded to br_ioctl_call(), which causes unnecessary RTNL dance and the splat below [0] under RTNL pressure.

Let's say Thread A is trying to detach a device from a bridge and Thread B is trying to remove the bridge.

In dev_ioctl(), Thread A bumps the bridge device's refcnt by netdev_hold() and releases RTNL because the following br_ioctl_call() also re-acquires RTNL.

In the race window, Thread B could acquire RTNL and try to remove the bridge device. Then, rtnl_unlock() by Thread B will release RTNL and wait for netdev_put() by Thread A.

Thread A, however, must hold RTNL after the unlock in dev_ifsioc(), which may take long under RTNL pressure, resulting in the splat by Thread B.

Thread A (SIOCBRDELIF) Thread B (SIOCBRDELBR) ---------------------- ---------------------- sock_ioctl sock_ioctl - sock_do_ioctl - br_ioctl_call - dev_ioctl - br_ioctl_stub |- rtnl_lock | |- dev_ifsioc ' ' |- dev = __dev_get_by_name(...) |- netdev_hold(dev, ...) . / |- rtnl_unlock ------. | | |- br_ioctl_call ---> |- rtnl_lock Race | | - br_ioctl_stub |- br_del_bridge Window | | | |- dev = __dev_get_by_name(...) | | | May take long | - br_dev_delete(dev, ...) | | | under RTNL pressure | - unregister_netdevice_queue(dev, ...) | | | | - rtnl_unlock \ | |- rtnl_lock <-' - netdev_run_todo | |- ... - netdev_run_todo | - rtnl_unlock |- __rtnl_unlock | |- netdev_wait_allrefs_any |- netdev_put(dev, ...) <----------------' Wait refcnt decrement and log splat below

To avoid blocking SIOCBRDELBR unnecessarily, let's not call dev_ioctl() for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF.

In the dev_ioctl() path, we do the following:

  • Copy struct ifreq by get_user_ifreq in sock_do_ioctl()
  • Check CAP_NET_ADMIN in dev_ioctl()
  • Call dev_load() in dev_ioctl()
  • Fetch the master dev from ifr.ifr_name in dev_ifsioc()
  • can be done by request_module() in br_ioctl_call(), so we move
1., 2., and 4. to br_ioctl_stub().

Note that 2. is also checked later in add_del_if(), but it's better performed before RTNL.

SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF have been processed in dev_ioctl() since the pre-git era, and there seems to be no specific reason to process them there.

[0]: unregister_netdevice: waiting for wpan3 to become free. Usage count = 2 ref_tracker: wpan3@ffff8880662d8608 has 1/1 users at __netdev_tracker_alloc include/linux/netdevice.h:4282 [inline] netdev_hold include/linux/netdevice.h:4311 [inline] dev_ifsioc+0xc6a/0x1160 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:624 dev_ioctl+0x255/0x10c0 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:826 sock_do_ioctl+0x1ca/0x260 net/socket.c:1213 sock_ioctl+0x23a/0x6c0 net/socket.c:1318 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:892 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a4/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcb/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 16, 2025

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jul 14, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f51e471cb1577d510c3096e126678e1ea20d2efd
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed3ba9b6e280e14cc3148c1b226ba453f02fa76c
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d767ce15045df510f55cdd2af5df0eee71f928d0
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4888e1dcc341e9a132ef7b8516234b3c3296de56
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/338a0f3c66aef4ee13052880d02200aae8f2d8a8
Web page

net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00fe0ac64efd1f5373b3dd9f1f84b19235371e39

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-azure (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1102.106) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1051.54.1) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.14.0-22.22) @ plucky2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.14.0-1007.7) @ plucky2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1067 (5.15.0-1067.71) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1103.93) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-5.15 (5.15.0.1099.98) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iot-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1094.98) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-igx-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1044.46) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1097.95) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1109.94) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1109.107) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-110.110) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1047.48) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.57+fips1) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1051.54) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.8 (6.8.0-1052.56) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1049.50) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2042.43) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1054.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1110.119~20.04.1) @ focal2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1054.60) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.60+fips1) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1029.30) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1059.65~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-09-08ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-124.8.1.el10_12025-11-11redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-611.5.1.el9_72025-11-11redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.198 (fixes >=5.15.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.159-1~deb11u1 (14 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.162-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1: fixed in 6.1.162-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.69-1: fixed in 6.12.69-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.16~rc7-1~exp1 (62 versions)
  • every version up to 6.16.3-1: fixed in 6.16.3-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 182 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 88 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-15 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-15 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jch8-hv9x-vvc6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  3. 2026-10-15 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-15 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-15 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jch8-hv9x-vvc6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-11 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-09-28 00:19 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  8. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-08 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-08 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-08 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jch8-hv9x-vvc6 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  26. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-08-25 16:40 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  44. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  46. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  47. 2026-08-09 08:57 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  49. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  50. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  51. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  52. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  53. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  54. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  55. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  56. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  57. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  58. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  59. 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  60. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  61. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  62. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  63. 2026-07-24 09:11 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  65. 2026-07-23 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  68. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  69. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-22111?
CVE-2025-22111 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: Remove RTNL dance for SIOCBRADDIF and SIOCBRDELIF. SIOCBRDELIF is passed to dev_ioctl() first and later forwarded to brioctlcall(), which causes unnecessary RTNL dance and the splat below [0] under RTNL pressure. Let's say…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-22111 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-22111 was published on April 16, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-22111 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-22111 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-22111?
CVE-2025-22111 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-22111?
A fix for CVE-2025-22111 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-22111 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-22111

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-22111?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.