CVE-2025-22090

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-04-16. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-11206 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range()

If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which we neither performed any reservation nor copied any page tables.

Consequently untrack_pfn() will see VM_PAT and try obtaining the PAT information from the page table -- which fails because the page table was not copied.

The easiest fix would be to simply clear the VM_PAT flag of the dst VMA if track_pfn_copy() fails. However, the whole thing is about "simply" clearing the VM_PAT flag is shaky as well: if we passed track_pfn_copy() and performed a reservation, but copying the page tables fails, we'll simply clear the VM_PAT flag, not properly undoing the reservation ... which is also wrong.

So let's fix it properly: set the VM_PAT flag only if the reservation succeeded (leaving it clear initially), and undo the reservation if anything goes wrong while copying the page tables: clearing the VM_PAT flag after undoing the reservation.

Note that any copied page table entries will get zapped when the VMA will get removed later, after copy_page_range() succeeded; as VM_PAT is not set then, we won't try cleaning VM_PAT up once more and untrack_pfn() will be happy. Note that leaving these page tables in place without a reservation is not a problem, as we are aborting fork(); this process will never run.

A reproducer can trigger this usually at the first try:

https://gitlab.com/davidhildenbrand/scratchspace/-/raw/main/reproducers/pat_fork.c

WARNING: CPU: 26 PID: 11650 at arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:983 get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 Modules linked in: ... CPU: 26 UID: 0 PID: 11650 Comm: repro3 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5+ #92 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:get_pat_info+0xf6/0x110 ... Call Trace: ... untrack_pfn+0x52/0x110 unmap_single_vma+0xa6/0xe0 unmap_vmas+0x105/0x1f0 exit_mmap+0xf6/0x460 __mmput+0x4b/0x120 copy_process+0x1bf6/0x2aa0 kernel_clone+0xab/0x440 __do_sys_clone+0x66/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x95/0x180

Likely this case was missed in:

d155df53f310 ("x86/mm/pat: clear VM_PAT if copy_p4d_range failed")

... and instead of undoing the reservation we simply cleared the VM_PAT flag.

Keep the documentation of these functions in include/linux/pgtable.h, one place is more than sufficient -- we should clean that up for the other functions like track_pfn_remap/untrack_pfn separately.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 16, 2025

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jul 19, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de6185b8892d88142ef69768fe4077cbf40109c0
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc84bc2aba85a1508f04a936f9f9a15f64ebfb31
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/da381c33f3aa6406406c9fdf07b8b0b63e0ce722
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b07398e8a5da517083f5c3f2daa8f6681b48ab28
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6623712ba8449876f0b3de9462831523fb851e4
Web page

x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d6373f83f367dbed316ddeb178130a3a64b5b67

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-22090(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(18)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.159-1~deb11u1 (14 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.162-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.162-1: fixed in 6.1.162-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.25-1: fixed in 6.12.25-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.25-1: fixed in 6.12.25-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(17)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 213 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 117 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-06 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 19:55 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-25 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-15 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  4. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-15 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-15 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-15 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  8. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-11 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 00:19 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  31. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  32. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  33. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  35. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  36. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  37. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  38. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  39. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  40. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  41. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  43. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  44. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  45. 2026-09-08 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-08 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-526j-rpwr-89fg · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-09-07 12:48 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  50. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  51. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  53. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  55. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  57. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  59. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  61. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  62. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  63. 2026-08-20 22:01 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  66. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  68. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  69. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  70. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  71. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-22090?
CVE-2025-22090 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/mm/pat: Fix VM_PAT handling when fork() fails in copy_page_range() If track_pfn_copy() fails, we already added the dst VMA to the maple tree. As fork() fails, we'll cleanup the maple tree, and stumble over the dst VMA for which…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-22090 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-22090 was published on April 16, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-22090 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-22090 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-22090?
CVE-2025-22090 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-22090?
A fix for CVE-2025-22090 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-22090 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-22090

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-22090?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.