CVE-2025-22023

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2025-04-16. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: xhci: Don't skip on Stopped - Length Invalid

Up until commit d56b0b2ab142 ("usb: xhci: ensure skipped isoc TDs are returned when isoc ring is stopped") in v6.11, the driver didn't skip missed isochronous TDs when handling Stoppend and Stopped - Length Invalid events. Instead, it erroneously cleared the skip flag, which would cause the ring to get stuck, as future events won't match the missed TD which is never removed from the queue until it's cancelled.

This buggy logic seems to have been in place substantially unchanged since the 3.x series over 10 years ago, which probably speaks first and foremost about relative rarity of this case in normal usage, but by the spec I see no reason why it shouldn't be possible.

After d56b0b2ab142, TDs are immediately skipped when handling those Stopped events. This poses a potential problem in case of Stopped - Length Invalid, which occurs either on completed TDs (likely already given back) or Link and No-Op TRBs. Such event won't be recognized as matching any TD (unless it's the rare Link TRB inside a TD) and will result in skipping all pending TDs, giving them back possibly before they are done, risking isoc data loss and maybe UAF by HW.

As a compromise, don't skip and don't clear the skip flag on this kind of event. Then the next event will skip missed TDs. A downside of not handling Stopped - Length Invalid on a Link inside a TD is that if the TD is cancelled, its actual length will not be updated to account for TRBs (silently) completed before the TD was stopped.

I had no luck producing this sequence of completion events so there is no compelling demonstration of any resulting disaster. It may be a very rare, obscure condition. The sole motivation for this patch is that if such unlikely event does occur, I'd rather risk reporting a cancelled partially done isoc frame as empty than gamble with UAF.

This will be fixed more properly by looking at Stopped event's TRB pointer when making skipping decisions, but such rework is unlikely to be backported to v6.12, which will stay around for a few years.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 16, 2025

Last Modified

October 28, 2025

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 108 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 09:11 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 04:21 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-18 15:35 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-22023?
CVE-2025-22023 is a high vulnerability published on April 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: xhci: Don't skip on Stopped - Length Invalid Up until commit d56b0b2ab142 ("usb: xhci: ensure skipped isoc TDs are returned when isoc ring is stopped") in v6.11, the driver didn't skip missed isochronous TDs when handling…
When was CVE-2025-22023 disclosed?
CVE-2025-22023 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 16, 2025, with the most recent update on October 28, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-22023 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-22023 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 91.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-22023?
CVE-2025-22023 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-22023?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-22023, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-22023

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-22023?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.