CVE-2025-21977

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-04-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fbdev: hyperv_fb: Fix hang in kdump kernel when on Hyper-V Gen 2 VMs

Gen 2 Hyper-V VMs boot via EFI and have a standard EFI framebuffer device. When the kdump kernel runs in such a VM, loading the efifb driver may hang because of accessing the framebuffer at the wrong memory address.

The scenario occurs when the hyperv_fb driver in the original kernel moves the framebuffer to a different MMIO address because of conflicts with an already-running efifb or simplefb driver. The hyperv_fb driver then informs Hyper-V of the change, which is allowed by the Hyper-V FB VMBus device protocol. However, when the kexec command loads the kdump kernel into crash memory via the kexec_file_load() system call, the system call doesn't know the framebuffer has moved, and it sets up the kdump screen_info using the original framebuffer address. The transition to the kdump kernel does not go through the Hyper-V host, so Hyper-V does not reset the framebuffer address like it would do on a reboot. When efifb tries to run, it accesses a non-existent framebuffer address, which traps to the Hyper-V host. After many such accesses, the Hyper-V host thinks the guest is being malicious, and throttles the guest to the point that it runs very slowly or appears to have hung.

When the kdump kernel is loaded into crash memory via the kexec_load() system call, the problem does not occur. In this case, the kexec command builds the screen_info table itself in user space from data returned by the FBIOGET_FSCREENINFO ioctl against /dev/fb0, which gives it the new framebuffer location.

This problem was originally reported in 2020 [1], resulting in commit 3cb73bc3fa2a ("hyperv_fb: Update screen_info after removing old framebuffer"). This commit solved the problem by setting orig_video_isVGA to 0, so the kdump kernel was unaware of the EFI framebuffer. The efifb driver did not try to load, and no hang occurred. But in 2024, commit c25a19afb81c ("fbdev/hyperv_fb: Do not clear global screen_info") effectively reverted 3cb73bc3fa2a. Commit c25a19afb81c has no reference to 3cb73bc3fa2a, so perhaps it was done without knowing the implications that were reported with 3cb73bc3fa2a. In any case, as of commit c25a19afb81c, the original problem came back again.

Interestingly, the hyperv_drm driver does not have this problem because it never moves the framebuffer. The difference is that the hyperv_drm driver removes any conflicting framebuffers *before* allocating an MMIO address, while the hyperv_fb drivers removes conflicting framebuffers *after* allocating an MMIO address. With the "after" ordering, hyperv_fb may encounter a conflict and move the framebuffer to a different MMIO address. But the conflict is essentially bogus because it is removed a few lines of code later.

Rather than fix the problem with the approach from 2020 in commit 3cb73bc3fa2a, instead slightly reorder the steps in hyperv_fb so conflicting framebuffers are removed before allocating an MMIO address. Then the default framebuffer MMIO address should always be available, and there's never any confusion about which framebuffer address the kdump kernel should use -- it's always the original address provided by the Hyper-V host. This approach is already used by the hyperv_drm driver, and is consistent with the usage guidelines at the head of the module with the function aperture_remove_conflicting_devices().

This approach also solves a related minor problem when kexec_load() is used to load the kdump kernel. With current code, unbinding and rebinding the hyperv_fb driver could result in the framebuffer moving back to the default framebuffer address, because on the rebind there are no conflicts. If such a move is done after the kdump kernel is loaded with the new framebuffer address, at kdump time it could again have the wrong address.

This problem and fix are described in terms of the kdump kernel, but it can also occur ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 1, 2025

Last Modified

October 30, 2025

Patch Availability(19)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 108 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-24 10:11 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-07 05:51 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-18 17:05 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-21977?
CVE-2025-21977 is a medium vulnerability published on April 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: hyperv_fb: Fix hang in kdump kernel when on Hyper-V Gen 2 VMs Gen 2 Hyper-V VMs boot via EFI and have a standard EFI framebuffer device. When the kdump kernel runs in such a VM, loading the efifb driver may hang because of…
When was CVE-2025-21977 disclosed?
CVE-2025-21977 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 1, 2025, with the most recent update on October 30, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-21977 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-21977 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-21977?
CVE-2025-21977 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-21977?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-21977, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-21977

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-21977?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.