In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
x86/amd_nb: Use rdmsr_safe() in amd_get_mmconfig_range()
Xen doesn't offer MSR_FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE to all guests. This results
in the following warning:
unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0xc0010058 at rIP: 0xffffffff8101d19f (xen_do_read_msr+0x7f/0xa0)
Call Trace:
xen_read_msr+0x1e/0x30
amd_get_mmconfig_range+0x2b/0x80
quirk_amd_mmconfig_area+0x28/0x100
pnp_fixup_device+0x39/0x50
__pnp_add_device+0xf/0x150
pnp_add_device+0x3d/0x100
pnpacpi_add_device_handler+0x1f9/0x280
acpi_ns_get_device_callback+0x104/0x1c0
acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x1d0/0x260
acpi_get_devices+0x8a/0xb0
pnpacpi_init+0x50/0x80
do_one_initcall+0x46/0x2e0
kernel_init_freeable+0x1da/0x2f0
kernel_init+0x16/0x1b0
ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
based on quirks for a "PNP0c01" device. Treating MMCFG as disabled is the
right course of action, so no change is needed there.
This was most likely exposed by fixing the Xen MSR accessors to not be
silently-safe.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it