CVE-2025-21839

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-03-07. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop

Move the conditional loading of hardware DR6 with the guest's DR6 value out of the core .vcpu_run() loop to fix a bug where KVM can load hardware with a stale vcpu->arch.dr6.

When the guest accesses a DR and host userspace isn't debugging the guest, KVM disables DR interception and loads the guest's values into hardware on VM-Enter and saves them on VM-Exit. This allows the guest to access DRs at will, e.g. so that a sequence of DR accesses to configure a breakpoint only generates one VM-Exit.

For DR0-DR3, the logic/behavior is identical between VMX and SVM, and also identical between KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED (userspace debugging the guest) and KVM_DEBUGREG_WONT_EXIT (guest using DRs), and so KVM handles loading DR0-DR3 in common code, _outside_ of the core kvm_x86_ops.vcpu_run() loop.

But for DR6, the guest's value doesn't need to be loaded into hardware for KVM_DEBUGREG_BP_ENABLED, and SVM provides a dedicated VMCB field whereas VMX requires software to manually load the guest value, and so loading the guest's value into DR6 is handled by {svm,vmx}_vcpu_run(), i.e. is done _inside_ the core run loop.

Unfortunately, saving the guest values on VM-Exit is initiated by common x86, again outside of the core run loop. If the guest modifies DR6 (in hardware, when DR interception is disabled), and then the next VM-Exit is a fastpath VM-Exit, KVM will reload hardware DR6 with vcpu->arch.dr6 and clobber the guest's actual value.

The bug shows up primarily with nested VMX because KVM handles the VMX preemption timer in the fastpath, and the window between hardware DR6 being modified (in guest context) and DR6 being read by guest software is orders of magnitude larger in a nested setup. E.g. in non-nested, the VMX preemption timer would need to fire precisely between #DB injection and the #DB handler's read of DR6, whereas with a KVM-on-KVM setup, the window where hardware DR6 is "dirty" extends all the way from L1 writing DR6 to VMRESUME (in L1).

L1's view: ========== CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640961: kvm_entry: vcpu 0 A: L1 Writes DR6 CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640963: : Set DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff1

B: CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640967: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT intr_info 0x800000ec

D: L1 reads DR6, arch.dr6 = 0 CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640969: : Sync DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640976: kvm_entry: vcpu 0 L2 reads DR6, L1 disables DR interception CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640980: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216 CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640983: kvm_entry: vcpu 0

CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640983: : Set DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

L2 detects failure CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640987: kvm_exit: vcpu 0 reason HLT L1 reads DR6 (confirms failure) CPU 0/KVM-7289 [023] d.... 2925.640990: : Sync DRs, DR6 = 0xffff0ff0

L0's view: ========== L2 reads DR6, arch.dr6 = 0 CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] d.... 3410.005610: kvm_exit: vcpu 23 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216 CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] ..... 3410.005610: kvm_nested_vmexit: vcpu 23 reason DR_ACCESS info1 0x0000000000000216

L2 => L1 nested VM-Exit CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] ..... 3410.005610: kvm_nested_vmexit_inject: reason: DR_ACCESS ext_inf1: 0x0000000000000216

CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] d.... 3410.005610: kvm_entry: vcpu 23 CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] d.... 3410.005611: kvm_exit: vcpu 23 reason VMREAD CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] d.... 3410.005611: kvm_entry: vcpu 23 CPU 23/KVM-5046 [001] d.... 3410. ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 7, 2025

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 2, 2026
Patch available.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4271-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00010.html
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d456de38d9eb753a4e9fde053c18d4ef8e485339
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2fee09fc167c74a64adb08656cb993ea475197e
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a1723e9c53fe6431415be19302a56543daf503f5
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9efb2b99b96c86664bbdbdd2cdb354ac9627eb20
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93eeb6df1605b3a24f38afdba7ab903ba6b64133
Web page

KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4eb063de686bfcdfd03a8c801d1bbe87d2d5eb55

Patch Availability(22)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-26.26) @ oracular2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws (6.11.0-1014.15) @ oracular2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1014.15~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.144.141) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1083.81) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1088.92) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1087.77) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-edge (5.15.0.1083.89~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm-5.15 (5.15.0.1084.80) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1052.56) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-78.78) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1033.33) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1032.33) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1094.92) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1094.79) @ jammy2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2028.29) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.39) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1094.103~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-30ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.23) @ noble2026-05-30ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.7.1.el10_22026-05-19redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-611.5.1.el9_72025-11-11redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.182 (fixes >=5.7.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.137-1~deb11u1 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.140-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.140-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (40 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.140-1: fixed in 6.1.140-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.16-1: fixed in 6.12.16-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.16-1: fixed in 6.12.16-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 172 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 78 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 03:45 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-09-07 13:18 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  23. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  26. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  27. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  28. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  29. 2026-08-20 22:31 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  31. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  32. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  33. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  34. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  35. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  36. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  37. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  38. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  39. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  40. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  41. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  42. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-08-05 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-05 14:02 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-05 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m8v3-m369-c2xp · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  46. 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  47. 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  48. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  49. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  50. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  51. 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  52. 2026-07-30 07:19 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-07-30 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-07-30 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m8v3-m369-c2xp · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  55. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  56. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  57. 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  58. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  59. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  60. 2026-07-24 12:41 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  62. 2026-07-23 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  64. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  65. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  66. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  67. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  68. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  69. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-21839?
CVE-2025-21839 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 7, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: Load DR6 with guest value only before entering .vcpu_run() loop Move the conditional loading of hardware DR6 with the guest's DR6 value out of the core .vcpu_run() loop to fix a bug where KVM can load hardware with a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-21839 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-21839 was published on March 7, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-21839 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-21839 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-21839?
CVE-2025-21839 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-21839?
A fix for CVE-2025-21839 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-21839 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-21839

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-21839?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.