The Quiz Maker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via spoofed IP headers in all versions up to, and including, 6.7.0.56 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. This is only exploitable in configurations where the server is set up to retrieve the IP from a user-supplied field like X-Forwarded-For and limit users by IP is enabled.
CVE-2025-10042
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 58EG Risk 58/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity59% × 45%The EG Score, 5.9 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 59th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch for a fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 17, 2025
Last Modified
December 19, 2025
References (4)
- security@wordfencehttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/quiz-maker/tags/6.7.0.52/public/class-quiz-maker-public.phpProduct
- security@wordfencehttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/quiz-maker/tags/6.7.0.52/public/class-quiz-maker-public.php#L7145Product
- security@wordfencehttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/quiz-maker/tags/6.7.0.57/public/class-quiz-maker-public.php#L7149Product
- security@wordfencehttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/4eeae6dd-a41f-4878-aa92-064ec78367d7?source=cveThird Party Advisory
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 86 of 152 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 14 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 66 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
Show 61 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
- 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 54th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(2 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 1 GitHub PoC). No fix is on record, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly.
- GitHub PoCfumioryoto/Quiz-Maker-SQL-Injection-CVE-2025-10042Published Jan 25, 2026
This script exploits an SQL Injection vulnerability in WordPress Quiz Maker plugin (≤ 6.7.0.56) by injecting payloads via an HTTP header (default: X-Forwarded-For).
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52465Published Dec 25, 2025
WordPress Quiz Maker 6.7.0.56 - SQL Injection
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-10042?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-10042 published?
Is CVE-2025-10042 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-10042?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-10042?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-10042
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-10042?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.