CVE-2024-56687

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-12-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: musb: Fix hardware lockup on first Rx endpoint request

There is a possibility that a request's callback could be invoked from usb_ep_queue() (call trace below, supplemented with missing calls):

req->complete from usb_gadget_giveback_request (drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:999) usb_gadget_giveback_request from musb_g_giveback (drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:147) musb_g_giveback from rxstate (drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:784) rxstate from musb_ep_restart (drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1169) musb_ep_restart from musb_ep_restart_resume_work (drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1176) musb_ep_restart_resume_work from musb_queue_resume_work (drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:2279) musb_queue_resume_work from musb_gadget_queue (drivers/usb/musb/musb_gadget.c:1241) musb_gadget_queue from usb_ep_queue (drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c:300)

According to the docstring of usb_ep_queue(), this should not happen:

"Note that @req's ->complete() callback must never be called from within usb_ep_queue() as that can create deadlock situations."

In fact, a hardware lockup might occur in the following sequence:

  • The gadget is initialized using musb_gadget_enable().
  • Meanwhile, a packet arrives, and the RXPKTRDY flag is set, raising an
interrupt.
  • If IRQs are enabled, the interrupt is handled, but musb_g_rx() finds an
empty queue (next_request() returns NULL). The interrupt flag has already been cleared by the glue layer handler, but the RXPKTRDY flag remains set.
  • The first request is enqueued using usb_ep_queue(), leading to the call
of req->complete(), as shown in the call trace above.
  • If the callback enables IRQs and another packet is waiting, step (3)
repeats. The request queue is empty because usb_g_giveback() removes the request before invoking the callback.
  • The endpoint remains locked up, as the interrupt triggered by hardware
setting the RXPKTRDY flag has been handled, but the flag itself remains set.

For this scenario to occur, it is only necessary for IRQs to be enabled at some point during the complete callback. This happens with the USB Ethernet gadget, whose rx_complete() callback calls netif_rx(). If called in the task context, netif_rx() disables the bottom halves (BHs). When the BHs are re-enabled, IRQs are also enabled to allow soft IRQs to be processed. The gadget itself is initialized at module load (or at boot if built-in), but the first request is enqueued when the network interface is brought up, triggering rx_complete() in the task context via ioctl(). If a packet arrives while the interface is down, it can prevent the interface from receiving any further packets from the USB host.

The situation is quite complicated with many parties involved. This particular issue can be resolved in several possible ways:

  • Ensure that callbacks never enable IRQs. This would be difficult to
enforce, as discovering how netif_rx() interacts with interrupts was already quite challenging and u_ether is not the only function driver. Similar "bugs" could be hidden in other drivers as well.
  • Disable MUSB interrupts in musb_g_giveback() before calling the callback
and re-enable them afterwars (by calling musb_{dis,en}able_interrupts(), for example). This would ensure that MUSB interrupts are not handled during the callback, even if IRQs are enabled. In fact, it would allow IRQs to be enabled when releasing the lock. However, this feels like an inelegant hack.
  • Modify the interrupt handler to clear the RXPKTRDY flag if the request
queue is empty. While this approach also feels like a hack, it wastes CPU time by attempting to handle incoming packets when the software is not ready to process them.
  • Flush the Rx FIFO instead of calling rxstate() in musb_ep_restart().
This ensures that the hardware can receive packets when there is at least one request in the queue. Once I ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
5.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 28, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 15:37 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 13:01 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-08 03:28 UTCOSV refresh
  45. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-23 14:50 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-56687?
CVE-2024-56687 is a medium vulnerability published on December 28, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: musb: Fix hardware lockup on first Rx endpoint request There is a possibility that a request's callback could be invoked from usbepqueue() (call trace below, supplemented with missing calls): req->complete from…
When was CVE-2024-56687 disclosed?
CVE-2024-56687 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 28, 2024, with the most recent update on November 3, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-56687 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-56687 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 5.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-56687?
CVE-2024-56687 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-56687?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-56687, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-56687

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-56687?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.