CVE-2024-56633

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-12-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: ghsa, nvd
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp_bpf: Fix the sk_mem_uncharge logic in tcp_bpf_sendmsg

The current sk memory accounting logic in __SK_REDIRECT is pre-uncharging tosend bytes, which is either msg->sg.size or a smaller value apply_bytes.

Potential problems with this strategy are as follows:

  • If the actual sent bytes are smaller than tosend, we need to charge some
bytes back, as in line 487, which is okay but seems not clean.
  • When tosend is set to apply_bytes, as in line 417, and (ret < 0), we may
miss uncharging (msg->sg.size - apply_bytes) bytes.

[...] 415 tosend = msg->sg.size; 416 if (psock->apply_bytes && psock->apply_bytes < tosend) 417 tosend = psock->apply_bytes; [...] 443 sk_msg_return(sk, msg, tosend); 444 release_sock(sk); 446 origsize = msg->sg.size; 447 ret = tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(sk_redir, redir_ingress, 448 msg, tosend, flags); 449 sent = origsize - msg->sg.size; [...] 454 lock_sock(sk); 455 if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { 456 int free = sk_msg_free_nocharge(sk, msg); 458 if (!cork) 459 *copied -= free; 460 } [...] 487 if (eval == __SK_REDIRECT) 488 sk_mem_charge(sk, tosend - sent); [...]

When running the selftest test_txmsg_redir_wait_sndmem with txmsg_apply, the following warning will be reported:

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 57 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x190/0x1a0 Modules linked in: CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 57 Comm: kworker/6:0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1.bm.1-amd64+ #43 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events sk_psock_destroy RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x190/0x1a0 RSP: 0018:ffffad0a8021fe08 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000011 RBX: ffff9aab4475b900 RCX: ffff9aab481a0800 RDX: 0000000000000303 RSI: 0000000000000011 RDI: ffff9aab4475b900 RBP: ffff9aab4475b990 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9aab40050ec0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff9aae6fdb1d01 R12: ffff9aab49c60400 R13: ffff9aab49c60598 R14: ffff9aab49c60598 R15: dead000000000100 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9aae6fd80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007ffec7e47bd8 CR3: 00000001a1a1c004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace:

? __warn+0x89/0x130 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x190/0x1a0 ? report_bug+0xfc/0x1e0 ? handle_bug+0x5c/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? inet_sock_destruct+0x190/0x1a0 __sk_destruct+0x25/0x220 sk_psock_destroy+0x2b2/0x310 process_scheduled_works+0xa3/0x3e0 worker_thread+0x117/0x240 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xcf/0x100 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

In __SK_REDIRECT, a more concise way is delaying the uncharging after sent bytes are finalized, and uncharge this value. When (ret < 0), we shall invoke sk_msg_free.

Same thing happens in case __SK_DROP, when tosend is set to apply_bytes, we may miss uncharging (msg->sg.size - apply_bytes) bytes. The same warning will be reported in selftest.

[...] 468 case __SK_DROP: 469 default: 470 sk_msg_free_partial(sk, msg, tosend); 471 sk_msg_apply_bytes(psock, tosend); 472 *copied -= (tosend + delta); 473 return -EACCES; [...]

So instead of sk_msg_free_partial we can do sk_msg_free here.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EPSS
19.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 27, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-56633(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-21.21) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips (5.15.0.1079.69) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.135.133) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.4.0.1140.149~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1044.48) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.211.206) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-64k (6.11.0-1011.12) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1011.12~24.04.1) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt (5.15.0.1033.33) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime (5.15.0.1080.83) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.15.0.1076.72) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips (5.4.0.1116.113) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1017.17) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (5.4.0.1142.152~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1142.139) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips (5.4.0.1142.89) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (6.8.0-1027.29~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips (5.4.0.1145.87) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.11.0-1010.10) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.136.147~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (6.8.0-1028.30~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-iot (5.4.0.1048.46) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (5.15.0.1074.77~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04 (6.8.1-1020.21) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-edge (5.15.0.1086.95~20.04.1.61) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (6.8.0-1024.25~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-edge (5.15.0.1077.83~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-58.60~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (5.4.0.1090.95~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-05-23ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.7.1.el10_22026-05-19redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.4.287osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 15:37 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 64 more
  1. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-25 13:01 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-08 03:28 UTCOSV refresh
  32. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-23 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-05-23 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-05-23 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-56633?
CVE-2024-56633 is a high vulnerability published on December 27, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcpbpf: Fix the skmemuncharge logic in tcpbpf_sendmsg The current sk memory accounting logic in SK_REDIRECT is pre-uncharging tosend bytes, which is either msg->sg.size or a smaller value apply_bytes. Potential problems with this…
When was CVE-2024-56633 disclosed?
CVE-2024-56633 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 27, 2024, with the most recent update on November 3, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-56633 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-56633 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 19.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-56633?
CVE-2024-56633 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-56633?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-56633, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-56633

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-56633?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.