CVE-2024-53169

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2024-12-27. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2024-51841 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8j7f-c39f-g4m3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvme-fabrics: fix kernel crash while shutting down controller

The nvme keep-alive operation, which executes at a periodic interval, could potentially sneak in while shutting down a fabric controller. This may lead to a race between the fabric controller admin queue destroy code path (invoked while shutting down controller) and hw/hctx queue dispatcher called from the nvme keep-alive async request queuing operation. This race could lead to the kernel crash shown below:

Call Trace: autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0xbc (unreliable) __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x114/0x24c blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x44/0x84 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x140/0x220 nvme_keep_alive_work+0xc8/0x19c [nvme_core] process_one_work+0x200/0x4e0 worker_thread+0x340/0x504 kthread+0x138/0x140 start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18

While shutting down fabric controller, if nvme keep-alive request sneaks in then it would be flushed off. The nvme_keep_alive_end_io function is then invoked to handle the end of the keep-alive operation which decrements the admin->q_usage_counter and assuming this is the last/only request in the admin queue then the admin->q_usage_counter becomes zero. If that happens then blk-mq destroy queue operation (blk_mq_destroy_ queue()) which could be potentially running simultaneously on another cpu (as this is the controller shutdown code path) would forward progress and deletes the admin queue. So, now from this point onward we are not supposed to access the admin queue resources. However the issue here's that the nvme keep-alive thread running hw/hctx queue dispatch operation hasn't yet finished its work and so it could still potentially access the admin queue resource while the admin queue had been already deleted and that causes the above crash.

The above kernel crash is regression caused due to changes implemented in commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()"). Ideally we should stop keep-alive before destroyin g the admin queue and freeing the admin tagset so that it wouldn't sneak in during the shutdown operation. However we removed the keep alive stop operation from the beginning of the controller shutdown code path in commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()") and added it under nvme_uninit_ctrl() which executes very late in the shutdown code path after the admin queue is destroyed and its tagset is removed. So this change created the possibility of keep-alive sneaking in and interfering with the shutdown operation and causing observed kernel crash.

To fix the observed crash, we decided to move nvme_stop_keep_alive() from nvme_uninit_ctrl() to nvme_remove_admin_tag_set(). This change would ensure that we don't forward progress and delete the admin queue until the keep- alive operation is finished (if it's in-flight) or cancelled and that would help contain the race condition explained above and hence avoid the crash.

Moving nvme_stop_keep_alive() to nvme_remove_admin_tag_set() instead of adding nvme_stop_keep_alive() to the beginning of the controller shutdown code path in nvme_stop_ctrl(), as was the case earlier before commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()"), would help save one callsite of nvme_stop_keep_alive().

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
45th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 27, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.3-1: fixed in 6.12.3-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.3-1: fixed in 6.12.3-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 220 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 125 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-09 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  2. 2026-11-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-11-07 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8j7f-c39f-g4m3 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  4. 2026-11-07 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-11-07 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  6. 2026-11-06 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  7. 2026-11-05 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  14. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  16. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  17. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  20. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-24 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8j7f-c39f-g4m3 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  24. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  25. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  3. 2026-10-19 17:55 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  8. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  10. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  11. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-10-12 17:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  27. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  28. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  29. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 22:42 UTCOSV refresh
  31. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  32. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  34. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  35. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  36. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  37. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  38. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  39. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  40. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  41. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  43. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  44. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  45. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  46. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  47. 2026-09-07 08:47 UTCOSV refresh
  48. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  49. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  50. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  51. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  55. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  57. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  58. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  59. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  60. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  61. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  65. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  66. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  67. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  68. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  69. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  70. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-53169?
CVE-2024-53169 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on December 27, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-fabrics: fix kernel crash while shutting down controller The nvme keep-alive operation, which executes at a periodic interval, could potentially sneak in while shutting down a fabric controller. This may lead to a race between…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-53169 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-53169 was published on December 27, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-53169 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-53169 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-53169?
CVE-2024-53169 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-53169?
A fix for CVE-2024-53169 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-53169

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-53169?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.