CVE-2024-53169

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-12-27. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvme-fabrics: fix kernel crash while shutting down controller

The nvme keep-alive operation, which executes at a periodic interval, could potentially sneak in while shutting down a fabric controller. This may lead to a race between the fabric controller admin queue destroy code path (invoked while shutting down controller) and hw/hctx queue dispatcher called from the nvme keep-alive async request queuing operation. This race could lead to the kernel crash shown below:

Call Trace: autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0xbc (unreliable) __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x114/0x24c blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x44/0x84 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x140/0x220 nvme_keep_alive_work+0xc8/0x19c [nvme_core] process_one_work+0x200/0x4e0 worker_thread+0x340/0x504 kthread+0x138/0x140 start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18

While shutting down fabric controller, if nvme keep-alive request sneaks in then it would be flushed off. The nvme_keep_alive_end_io function is then invoked to handle the end of the keep-alive operation which decrements the admin->q_usage_counter and assuming this is the last/only request in the admin queue then the admin->q_usage_counter becomes zero. If that happens then blk-mq destroy queue operation (blk_mq_destroy_ queue()) which could be potentially running simultaneously on another cpu (as this is the controller shutdown code path) would forward progress and deletes the admin queue. So, now from this point onward we are not supposed to access the admin queue resources. However the issue here's that the nvme keep-alive thread running hw/hctx queue dispatch operation hasn't yet finished its work and so it could still potentially access the admin queue resource while the admin queue had been already deleted and that causes the above crash.

The above kernel crash is regression caused due to changes implemented in commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()"). Ideally we should stop keep-alive before destroyin g the admin queue and freeing the admin tagset so that it wouldn't sneak in during the shutdown operation. However we removed the keep alive stop operation from the beginning of the controller shutdown code path in commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()") and added it under nvme_uninit_ctrl() which executes very late in the shutdown code path after the admin queue is destroyed and its tagset is removed. So this change created the possibility of keep-alive sneaking in and interfering with the shutdown operation and causing observed kernel crash.

To fix the observed crash, we decided to move nvme_stop_keep_alive() from nvme_uninit_ctrl() to nvme_remove_admin_tag_set(). This change would ensure that we don't forward progress and delete the admin queue until the keep- alive operation is finished (if it's in-flight) or cancelled and that would help contain the race condition explained above and hence avoid the crash.

Moving nvme_stop_keep_alive() to nvme_remove_admin_tag_set() instead of adding nvme_stop_keep_alive() to the beginning of the controller shutdown code path in nvme_stop_ctrl(), as was the case earlier before commit a54a93d0e359 ("nvme: move stopping keep-alive into nvme_uninit_ctrl()"), would help save one callsite of nvme_stop_keep_alive().

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
21(Track)
EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
44%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 27, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.3-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.3-1

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 165 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-07 08:47 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-05 11:51 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-05 11:51 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-05 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-04 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-04 11:21 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-04 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-31 08:42 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-23 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-13 16:07 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-53169?
CVE-2024-53169 is a medium vulnerability published on December 27, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme-fabrics: fix kernel crash while shutting down controller The nvme keep-alive operation, which executes at a periodic interval, could potentially sneak in while shutting down a fabric controller. This may lead to a race between…
When was CVE-2024-53169 disclosed?
CVE-2024-53169 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 27, 2024, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-53169 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-53169 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 55.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-53169?
CVE-2024-53169 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-53169?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-53169, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-53169

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-53169?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.