“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-02-05), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.
A fix is available — apply it.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: uvcvideo: Skip parsing frames of type UVC_VS_UNDEFINED in uvc_parse_format
This can lead to out of bounds writes since frames of this type were not taken into account when calculating the size of the frames buffer in uvc_parse_streaming.
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cve-announce/2024120232-CVE-2024-53104-d781@gregkh/ · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53104
December 2, 2024
November 4, 2025
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.13.56 bug fix and security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.46 bug fix and security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.18.1 bug fix and security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.14.48 security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.16.35 security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: kpatch-patch-4_18_0-477_43_1, kpatch-patch-4_18_0-477_67_1, and kpatch-patch-4_18_0-477_81_1 security update
Red Hat Security Advisory: kpatch-patch-4_18_0-372_118_1, kpatch-patch-4_18_0-372_131_1, and kpatch-patch-4_18_0-372_91_1 security update
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | 5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (44 versions) |
| — |
| linux-6.1 | 6.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1 |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | 6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (31 versions) |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | — |
| — |
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
RHSA-2025:1230 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1231 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1253 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1254 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1262 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1264 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1266 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1267 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1268 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1269 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1270 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1278 — Moderate
RHSA-2025:1280 — Moderate
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,977 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,877 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
Hardening kernel C parsers via Rust rewrite + differential fuzzing + formal verification. First target: UVC (CVE-2024-53104).
Open source ↗redhat:RHSA-2025:2701 · ubuntu:USN-7288-1
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-53104
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.