CVE-2024-53095

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-11-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace.

Recently, we got a customer report that CIFS triggers oops while reconnecting to a server. [0]

The workload runs on Kubernetes, and some pods mount CIFS servers in non-root network namespaces. The problem rarely happened, but it was always while the pod was dying.

The root cause is wrong reference counting for network namespace.

CIFS uses kernel sockets, which do not hold refcnt of the netns that the socket belongs to. That means CIFS must ensure the socket is always freed before its netns; otherwise, use-after-free happens.

The repro steps are roughly:

  • mount CIFS in a non-root netns
  • drop packets from the netns
  • destroy the netns
  • unmount CIFS

We can reproduce the issue quickly with the script [1] below and see the splat [2] if CONFIG_NET_NS_REFCNT_TRACKER is enabled.

When the socket is TCP, it is hard to guarantee the netns lifetime without holding refcnt due to async timers.

Let's hold netns refcnt for each socket as done for SMC in commit 9744d2bf1976 ("smc: Fix use-after-free in tcp_write_timer_handler().").

Note that we need to move put_net() from cifs_put_tcp_session() to clean_demultiplex_info(); otherwise, __sock_create() still could touch a freed netns while cifsd tries to reconnect from cifs_demultiplex_thread().

Also, maybe_get_net() cannot be put just before __sock_create() because the code is not under RCU and there is a small chance that the same address happened to be reallocated to another netns.

[0]: CIFS: VFS: \\XXXXXXXXXXX has not responded in 15 seconds. Reconnecting... CIFS: Serverclose failed 4 times, giving up Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 14de99e461f84a07 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 CM = 0, WnR = 0 [14de99e461f84a07] address between user and kernel address ranges Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: cls_bpf sch_ingress nls_utf8 cifs cifs_arc4 cifs_md4 dns_resolver tcp_diag inet_diag veth xt_state xt_connmark nf_conntrack_netlink xt_nat xt_statistic xt_MASQUERADE xt_mark xt_addrtype ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_chain_nat nf_nat xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_comment nft_compat nf_tables nfnetlink overlay nls_ascii nls_cp437 sunrpc vfat fat aes_ce_blk aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sm4_ce_cipher sm4 sm3_ce sm3 sha3_ce sha512_ce sha512_arm64 sha1_ce ena button sch_fq_codel loop fuse configfs dmi_sysfs sha2_ce sha256_arm64 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod dax efivarfs CPU: 5 PID: 2690970 Comm: cifsd Not tainted 6.1.103-109.184.amzn2023.aarch64 #1 Hardware name: Amazon EC2 r7g.4xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 11/1/2018 pstate: 00400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : fib_rules_lookup+0x44/0x238 lr : __fib_lookup+0x64/0xbc sp : ffff8000265db790 x29: ffff8000265db790 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 000000000000bd01 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff000b4baf8000 x24: ffff00047b5e4580 x23: ffff8000265db7e0 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffff00047b5e4500 x20: ffff0010e3f694f8 x19: 14de99e461f849f7 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 3f92800abd010002 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff0010e3f69420 x9 : ffff800008a6f294 x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000006 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : ffff001924354280 x3 : ffff8000265db7e0 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff0010e3f694f8 x0 : ffff00047b5e4500 Call trace: fib_rules_lookup+0x44/0x238 __fib_lookup+0x64/0xbc ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu+0x2c4/0x398 ip_route_output_key_hash+0x60/0x8c tcp_v4_connect+0x290/0x488 __inet_stream_connect+0x108/0x3d0 inet_stream_connect+0x50/0x78 kernel_connect+0x6c/0xac generic_ip_conne ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
45th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 21, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 27, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef7134c7fc48e1441b398e55a862232868a6f0a7
Web page

smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7f9282fc27fc36dbaffc8527c723de264a132f8
Web page

smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace. - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8c71494181153a134c96da28766a57bd1eac8cb

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-53095(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (498 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (353 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.9-1: fixed in 6.11.9-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.9-1: fixed in 6.11.9-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 91 of 187 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 96 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 17:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  14. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  15. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-10-02 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  20. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-09-26 22:42 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  2. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  4. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  5. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  6. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  7. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  8. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  13. 2026-09-07 08:47 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  15. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  17. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  18. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  20. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  22. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  23. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  24. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  25. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  26. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  27. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  28. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  29. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  31. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  32. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  33. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  34. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  35. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
  36. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  37. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  38. 2026-08-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  39. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  40. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  41. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  42. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  43. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  44. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 43rd percentile
  45. 2026-08-05 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-05 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-05 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4p29-qp7w-5p8p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  49. 2026-08-04 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-04 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-04 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4p29-qp7w-5p8p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  53. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  54. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  55. 2026-07-31 11:42 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  57. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  58. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  59. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  60. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  61. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  62. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  63. 2026-07-23 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  65. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  66. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-53095?
CVE-2024-53095 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace. Recently, we got a customer report that CIFS triggers oops while reconnecting to a server. [0] The workload runs on Kubernetes, and some pods mount CIFS servers in non-root…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-53095 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-53095 was published on November 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-53095 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-53095 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-53095?
CVE-2024-53095 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-53095?
A fix for CVE-2024-53095 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-53095 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-53095

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-53095?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.