CVE-2024-53071

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-11-19. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/panthor: Be stricter about IO mapping flags

The current panthor_device_mmap_io() implementation has two issues:

  • For mapping DRM_PANTHOR_USER_FLUSH_ID_MMIO_OFFSET,
panthor_device_mmap_io() bails if VM_WRITE is set, but does not clear VM_MAYWRITE. That means userspace can use mprotect() to make the mapping writable later on. This is a classic Linux driver gotcha. I don't think this actually has any impact in practice: When the GPU is powered, writes to the FLUSH_ID seem to be ignored; and when the GPU is not powered, the dummy_latest_flush page provided by the driver is deliberately designed to not do any flushes, so the only thing writing to the dummy_latest_flush could achieve would be to make *more* flushes happen.
  • panthor_device_mmap_io() does not block MAP_PRIVATE mappings (which are
mappings without the VM_SHARED flag). MAP_PRIVATE in combination with VM_MAYWRITE indicates that the VMA has copy-on-write semantics, which for VM_PFNMAP are semi-supported but fairly cursed. In particular, in such a mapping, the driver can only install PTEs during mmap() by calling remap_pfn_range() (because remap_pfn_range() wants to **store the physical address of the mapped physical memory into the vm_pgoff of the VMA**); installing PTEs later on with a fault handler (as panthor does) is not supported in private mappings, and so if you try to fault in such a mapping, vmf_insert_pfn_prot() splats when it hits a BUG() check.

Fix it by clearing the VM_MAYWRITE flag (userspace writing to the FLUSH_ID doesn't make sense) and requiring VM_SHARED (copy-on-write semantics for the FLUSH_ID don't make sense).

Reproducers for both scenarios are in the notes of my patch on the mailing list; I tested that these bugs exist on a Rock 5B machine.

Note that I only compile-tested the patch, I haven't tested it; I don't have a working kernel build setup for the test machine yet. Please test it before applying it.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

November 19, 2024

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.11.8osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 116 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-31 11:42 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-13 19:08 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-25 16:46 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-08 06:28 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-53071?
CVE-2024-53071 is a medium vulnerability published on November 19, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/panthor: Be stricter about IO mapping flags The current panthordevicemmap_io() implementation has two issues: 1. For mapping DRMPANTHORUSERFLUSHIDMMIOOFFSET, panthordevicemmapio() bails if VMWRITE is set, but does not clear…
When was CVE-2024-53071 disclosed?
CVE-2024-53071 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on November 19, 2024, with the most recent update on October 1, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-53071 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-53071 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 90.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-53071?
CVE-2024-53071 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-53071?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-53071, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-53071

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-53071?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.