CVE-2024-50250

HIGHNVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-11-09. NVD baseline CVSS 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fsdax: dax_unshare_iter needs to copy entire blocks

The code that copies data from srcmap to iomap in dax_unshare_iter is very very broken, which bfoster's recent fsx changes have exposed.

If the pos and len passed to dax_file_unshare are not aligned to an fsblock boundary, the iter pos and length in the _iter function will reflect this unalignment.

dax_iomap_direct_access always returns a pointer to the start of the kmapped fsdax page, even if its pos argument is in the middle of that page. This is catastrophic for data integrity when iter->pos is not aligned to a page, because daddr/saddr do not point to the same byte in the file as iter->pos. Hence we corrupt user data by copying it to the wrong place.

If iter->pos + iomap_length() in the _iter function not aligned to a page, then we fail to copy a full block, and only partially populate the destination block. This is catastrophic for data confidentiality because we expose stale pmem contents.

Fix both of these issues by aligning copy_pos/copy_len to a page boundary (remember, this is fsdax so 1 fsblock == 1 base page) so that we always copy full blocks.

We're not done yet -- there's no call to invalidate_inode_pages2_range, so programs that have the file range mmap'd will continue accessing the old memory mapping after the file metadata updates have completed.

Be careful with the return value -- if the unshare succeeds, we still need to return the number of bytes that the iomap iter thinks we're operating on.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
32(Track)
EG Risk 32/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
14%
KEV
Not listed

Published

November 9, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 123 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-05 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-04 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-31 13:12 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 20:38 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 18:16 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-08 07:58 UTCOSV refresh
  68. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50250?
CVE-2024-50250 is a high vulnerability published on November 9, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fsdax: daxunshareiter needs to copy entire blocks The code that copies data from srcmap to iomap in daxunshareiter is very very broken, which bfoster's recent fsx changes have exposed. If the pos and len passed to daxfileunshare…
When was CVE-2024-50250 disclosed?
CVE-2024-50250 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on November 9, 2024, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-50250 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50250 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 86.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50250?
CVE-2024-50250 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50250?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-50250, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-50250

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50250?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.