In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
LoongArch: Enable IRQ if do_ale() triggered in irq-enabled context
Unaligned access exception can be triggered in irq-enabled context such
as user mode, in this case do_ale() may call get_user() which may cause
sleep. Then we will get:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at arch/loongarch/kernel/access-helper.h:7
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 129, name: modprobe
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 129 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 6.12.0-rc1+ #1723
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Stack : 9000000105e0bd48 0000000000000000 9000000003803944 9000000105e08000
9000000105e0bc70 9000000105e0bc78 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
9000000105e0bc78 0000000000000001 9000000185e0ba07 9000000105e0b890
ffffffffffffffff 9000000105e0bc78 73924b81763be05b 9000000100194500
000000000000020c 000000000000000a 0000000000000000 0000000000000003
00000000000023f0 00000000000e1401 00000000072f8000 0000007ffbb0e260
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 9000000005437650 90000000055d5000
0000000000000000 0000000000000003 0000007ffbb0e1f0 0000000000000000
0000005567b00490 0000000000000000 9000000003803964 0000007ffbb0dfec
00000000000000b0 0000000000000007 0000000000000003 0000000000071c1d
...
Call Trace:
[<9000000003803964>] show_stack+0x64/0x1a0
[<9000000004c57464>] dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xb0
[<9000000003861ab4>] __might_resched+0x154/0x1a0
[<900000000380c96c>] emulate_load_store_insn+0x6c/0xf60
[<9000000004c58118>] do_ale+0x78/0x180
[<9000000003801bc8>] handle_ale+0x128/0x1e0
So enable IRQ if unaligned access exception is triggered in irq-enabled
context to fix it.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it