CVE-2024-50063

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks

bpf progs can be attached to kernel functions, and the attached functions can take different parameters or return different return values. If prog attached to one kernel function tail calls prog attached to another kernel function, the ctx access or return value verification could be bypassed.

For example, if prog1 is attached to func1 which takes only 1 parameter and prog2 is attached to func2 which takes two parameters. Since verifier assumes the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed based on func2's prototype, verifier allows prog2 to access the second parameter from the bpf ctx passed to it. The problem is that verifier does not prevent prog1 from passing its bpf ctx to prog2 via tail call. In this case, the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed from func1 instead of func2, that is, the assumption for ctx access verification is bypassed.

Another example, if BPF LSM prog1 is attached to hook file_alloc_security, and BPF LSM prog2 is attached to hook bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known. Verifier knows the return value rules for these two hooks, e.g. it is legal for bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known to return positive number 1, and it is illegal for file_alloc_security to return positive number. So verifier allows prog2 to return positive number 1, but does not allow prog1 to return positive number. The problem is that verifier does not prevent prog1 from calling prog2 via tail call. In this case, prog2's return value 1 will be used as the return value for prog1's hook file_alloc_security. That is, the return value rule is bypassed.

This patch adds restriction for tail call to prevent such bypasses.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
35(Track)
EG Risk 35/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 18, 2026
Patch available.
generic Patch Available

[SECURITY] [DLA 4193-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/05/msg00045.html
generic

bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9a807fb7cbfad4328824186e2e4bee28f72169b
generic

bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88c2a10e6c176c2860cd0659f4c0e9d20b3f64d1
generic

bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d5e3b4cbe8ee16b7bf96fd73a421c92a9da3ca1
generic

bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28ead3eaabc16ecc907cfb71876da028080f6356

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-50063(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (498 versions)
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.129-1~deb11u1 (7 versions)6.1.137-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (37 versions)6.1.135-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.11.4-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.11.4-1

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 169 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-08 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-07 08:48 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-05 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-05 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-05 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-04 11:44 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-04 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-04 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-31 15:42 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-23 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-14 13:19 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  71. 2026-07-14 12:40 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  72. 2026-07-13 22:38 UTCOSV refresh
  73. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50063?
CVE-2024-50063 is a high vulnerability published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks bpf progs can be attached to kernel functions, and the attached functions can take different parameters or return different return values. If prog attached to one…
When was CVE-2024-50063 disclosed?
CVE-2024-50063 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 21, 2024, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-50063 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50063 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50063?
CVE-2024-50063 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50063?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-50063, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-50063

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50063?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.