CVE-2024-50002

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module()

Module insertion invokes static_call_add_module() to initialize the static calls in a module. static_call_add_module() invokes __static_call_init(), which allocates a struct static_call_mod to either encapsulate the built-in static call sites of the associated key into it so further modules can be added or to append the module to the module chain.

If that allocation fails the function returns with an error code and the module core invokes static_call_del_module() to clean up eventually added static_call_mod entries.

This works correctly, when all keys used by the module were converted over to a module chain before the failure. If not then static_call_del_module() causes a #GP as it blindly assumes that key::mods points to a valid struct static_call_mod.

The problem is that key::mods is not a individual struct member of struct static_call_key, it's part of a union to save space:

union { /* bit 0: 0 = mods, 1 = sites */ unsigned long type; struct static_call_mod *mods; struct static_call_site *sites; };

key::sites is a pointer to the list of built-in usage sites of the static call. The type of the pointer is differentiated by bit 0. A mods pointer has the bit clear, the sites pointer has the bit set.

As static_call_del_module() blidly assumes that the pointer is a valid static_call_mod type, it fails to check for this failure case and dereferences the pointer to the list of built-in call sites, which is obviously bogus.

Cure it by checking whether the key has a sites or a mods pointer.

If it's a sites pointer then the key is not to be touched. As the sites are walked in the same order as in __static_call_init() the site walk can be terminated because all subsequent sites have not been touched by the init code due to the error exit.

If it was converted before the allocation fail, then the inner loop which searches for a module match will find nothing.

A fail in the second allocation in __static_call_init() is harmless and does not require special treatment. The first allocation succeeded and converted the key to a module chain. That first entry has mod::mod == NULL and mod::next == NULL, so the inner loop of static_call_del_module() will neither find a module match nor a module chain. The next site in the walk was either already converted, but can't match the module, or it will exit the outer loop because it has a static_call_site pointer and not a static_call_mod pointer.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EPSS
14.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-50002(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(24)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.127.126) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1073.73) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.127.137~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg (5.15.0.1071.71) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1078.76) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1078.87~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1039.43) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1023.25) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gkeop-6.8 (6.8.0-1006.8) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual (6.8.0-54.56) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k (6.8.0-1022.25.2) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.8.0-1019.23) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1025.30) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1020.21) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1025.30~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04a (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-57.59~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia (6.8.0-1014.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.12.1.el9_62025-05-13redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.15.168osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(23)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-13 22:24 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-25 20:16 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-08 09:28 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-23 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-05-23 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-05-23 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50002?
CVE-2024-50002 is a medium vulnerability published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: staticcall: Handle module init failure correctly in staticcalldelmodule() Module insertion invokes staticcalladd_module() to initialize the static calls in a module. staticcalladdmodule() invokes staticcall_init(), which allocates…
When was CVE-2024-50002 disclosed?
CVE-2024-50002 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 21, 2024, with the most recent update on November 3, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-50002 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50002 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 14.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50002?
CVE-2024-50002 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50002?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-50002, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-50002

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50002?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.