CVE-2024-49878

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-10-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

resource: fix region_intersects() vs add_memory_driver_managed()

On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related to CXL memory may look like something as follows.

490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0 490000000-50fffffff : region0 490000000-50fffffff : dax0.0 490000000-50fffffff : System RAM (kmem)

Because drivers/dax/kmem.c calls add_memory_driver_managed() during onlining CXL memory, which makes "System RAM (kmem)" a descendant of "CXL Window X". This confuses region_intersects(), which expects all "System RAM" resources to be at the top level of iomem_resource. This can lead to bugs.

For example, when the following command line is executed to write some memory in CXL memory range via /dev/mem,

$ dd if=data of=/dev/mem bs=$((1 << 10)) seek=$((0x490000000 >> 10)) count=1 dd: error writing '/dev/mem': Bad address 1+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes copied, 0.0283507 s, 0.0 kB/s

the command fails as expected. However, the error code is wrong. It should be "Operation not permitted" instead of "Bad address". More seriously, the /dev/mem permission checking in devmem_is_allowed() passes incorrectly. Although the accessing is prevented later because ioremap() isn't allowed to map system RAM, it is a potential security issue. During command executing, the following warning is reported in the kernel log for calling ioremap() on system RAM.

ioremap on RAM at 0x0000000490000000 - 0x0000000490000fff WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 416 at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:216 __ioremap_caller.constprop.0+0x131/0x35d Call Trace: memremap+0xcb/0x184 xlate_dev_mem_ptr+0x25/0x2f write_mem+0x94/0xfb vfs_write+0x128/0x26d ksys_write+0xac/0xfe do_syscall_64+0x9a/0xfd entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

The details of command execution process are as follows. In the above resource tree, "System RAM" is a descendant of "CXL Window 0" instead of a top level resource. So, region_intersects() will report no System RAM resources in the CXL memory region incorrectly, because it only checks the top level resources. Consequently, devmem_is_allowed() will return 1 (allow access via /dev/mem) for CXL memory region incorrectly. Fortunately, ioremap() doesn't allow to map System RAM and reject the access.

So, region_intersects() needs to be fixed to work correctly with the resource tree with "System RAM" not at top level as above. To fix it, if we found a unmatched resource in the top level, we will continue to search matched resources in its descendant resources. So, we will not miss any matched resources in resource tree anymore.

In the new implementation, an example resource tree

|------------- "CXL Window 0" ------------| |-- "System RAM" --|

will behave similar as the following fake resource tree for region_intersects(, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM, ),

|-- "System RAM" --||-- "CXL Window 0a" --|

Where "CXL Window 0a" is part of the original "CXL Window 0" that isn't covered by "System RAM".

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 21, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-49878(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.127.126) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (5.15.0.1078.87~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.127.137~20.04.1) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg (5.15.0.1071.71) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1078.76) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.208.204) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1143.145) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-host (5.15.0-1039.43) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.4.0-1058 (5.4.0-1058.62) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k (6.8.0-1022.25.2) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual (6.8.0-54.56) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gkeop-6.8 (6.8.0-1006.8) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-kvm (5.4.0.1127.123) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.8.0-1019.23) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04a (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1025.30) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1138.131) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1020.21) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-20.04 (5.4.0.1086.115) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1023.25) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.22) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips (5.4.0.1116.113) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-57.59~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-edge (5.4.0.1142.152~18.04.1) @ bionic2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi2-hwe-18.04-edge (5.4.0.1129.160) @ focal2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia (6.8.0-1014.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.12.1.el9_62025-05-13redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.4.285 (fixes >=5.1.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (44 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.234-1: fixed in 5.10.234-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.115-1: fixed in 6.1.115-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.4-1: fixed in 6.11.4-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.4-1: fixed in 6.11.4-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(23)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 89 of 186 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 11 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 97 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 11:25 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  19. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  20. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  21. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  22. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
Show 64 more
  1. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  2. 2026-09-20 21:23 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  4. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  10. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  12. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  14. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  16. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  17. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  18. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  20. 2026-09-01 20:27 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  23. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  24. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  25. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  26. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  27. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  28. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  29. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  30. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  31. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  32. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  33. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  34. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  35. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  36. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  37. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  38. 2026-08-15 22:07 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  40. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  41. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  42. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  43. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  44. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  45. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  46. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  49. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  51. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  52. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  53. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  54. 2026-07-31 15:42 UTCOSV refresh
  55. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  56. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  57. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  58. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  59. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  60. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  61. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  62. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  63. 2026-07-23 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-49878?
CVE-2024-49878 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: resource: fix regionintersects() vs addmemorydrivermanaged() On a system with CXL memory, the resource tree (/proc/iomem) related to CXL memory may look like something as follows. 490000000-50fffffff : CXL Window 0…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-49878 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-49878 was published on October 21, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-49878 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-49878 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-49878?
CVE-2024-49878 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-49878?
A fix for CVE-2024-49878 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-49878 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-49878

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-49878?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.