CVE-2024-47813

LOWNVD 2.92.9—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 2.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
2.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 2.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly. Under certain concurrent event orderings, a wasmtime::Engine's internal type registry was susceptible to double-unregistration bugs due to a race condition, leading to panics and potentially type registry corruption. That registry corruption could, following an additional and particular sequence of concurrent events, lead to violations of WebAssembly's control-flow integrity (CFI) and type safety. Users that do not use wasmtime::Engine across multiple threads are not affected. Users that only create new modules across threads over time are additionally not affected. Reproducing this bug requires creating and dropping multiple type instances (such as wasmtime::FuncType or wasmtime::ArrayType) concurrently on multiple threads, where all types are associated with the same wasmtime::Engine. Wasm guests cannot trigger this bug. See the "References" section below for a list of Wasmtime types-related APIs that are affected. Wasmtime maintains an internal registry of types within a wasmtime::Engine and an engine is shareable across threads. Types can be created and referenced through creation of a wasmtime::Module, creation of wasmtime::FuncType, or a number of other APIs where the host creates a function (see "References" below). Each of these cases interacts with an engine to deduplicate type information and manage type indices that are used to implement type checks in WebAssembly's call_indirect function, for example. This bug is a race condition in this management where the internal type registry could be corrupted to trigger an assert or contain invalid state. Wasmtime's internal representation of a type has individual types (e.g. one-per-host-function) maintain a registration count of how many time it's been used. Types additionally have state within an engine behind a read-write lock such as lookup/deduplication information. The race here is a time-of-check versus time-of-use (TOCTOU) bug where one thread atomically decrements a type entry's registration count, observes zero registrations, and then acquires a lock in order to unregister that entry. However, between when this first thread observed the zero-registration count and when it acquires that lock, another thread could perform the following sequence of events: re-register another copy of the type, which deduplicates to that same entry, resurrecting it and incrementing its registration count; then drop the type and decrement its registration count; observe that the registration count is now zero; acquire the type registry lock; and finally unregister the type. Now, when the original thread finally acquires the lock and unregisters the entry, it is the second time this entry has been unregistered. This bug was originally introduced in Wasmtime 19's development of the WebAssembly GC proposal. This bug affects users who are not using the GC proposal, however, and affects Wasmtime in its default configuration even when the GC proposal is disabled. Wasmtime users using 19.0.0 and after are all affected by this issue. We have released the following Wasmtime versions, all of which have a fix for this bug: * 21.0.2 * 22.0.1 * 23.0.3 * 24.0.1 * 25.0.2. If your application creates and drops Wasmtime types on multiple threads concurrently, there are no known workarounds. Users are encouraged to upgrade to a patched release.

CVSS v3
2.9
EG Score
2.9LOWmedium confidence
EG Risk
13
EG Risk 13/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity29% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

October 9, 2024

Last Modified

September 29, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-47813(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
crates.io(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
wasmtime—
  • 19.0.0 up to 21.0.2: fixed in 21.0.2
  • 22.0.0 up to 22.0.1: fixed in 22.0.1
  • 23.0.0 up to 23.0.3: fixed in 23.0.3
  • 24.0.0 up to 24.0.1: fixed in 24.0.1
  • 25.0.0 up to 25.0.2: fixed in 25.0.2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rust-wasmtime—
  • every version up to 21.0.2+dfsg-1: fixed in 21.0.2+dfsg-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rust-wasmtime—
  • every version up to 21.0.2+dfsg-1: fixed in 21.0.2+dfsg-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
wasmtime0.0.1 ... 9.0.0 (68 versions)
  • every version through 19.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 19.0.1: no fix on record
  • every version through 19.0.2: no fix on record
  • every version through 20.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 20.0.1: no fix on record
  • every version through 20.0.2: no fix on record
  • every version through 21.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 21.0.1: no fix on record
  • every version through 22.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 23.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 23.0.1: no fix on record
  • every version through 23.0.2: no fix on record
  • every version through 24.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 25.0.0: no fix on record
  • every version through 25.0.1: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 184 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-10 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-30 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-20 21:53 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 20:58 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-15 22:37 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-31 16:42 UTCOSV refresh
  53. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-23 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-47813?
CVE-2024-47813 is a low vulnerability published on October 9, 2024. Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly. Under certain concurrent event orderings, a wasmtime::Engine's internal type registry was susceptible to double-unregistration bugs due to a race condition, leading to panics and potentially type registry corruption. That registry corruption…
When was CVE-2024-47813 disclosed?
CVE-2024-47813 was first published on October 9, 2024, with the most recent update on September 29, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-47813 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-47813 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-47813?
CVE-2024-47813 has a CVSS v3 base score of 2.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-47813?
A fix for CVE-2024-47813 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-47813 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-47813

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-47813?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.