CVE-2024-45025

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-09-11. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE

copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old->full_fds_bits[] and fill the rest with zeroes. What it does is copying enough words (BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest. That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are clear. Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word we'd copied.

For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has count equal to old->max_fds, so there's no open descriptors past count, let alone fully occupied words in ->open_fds[], which is what bits in ->full_fds_bits[] correspond to.

The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds), which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all opened descriptors below max_fds. In the common case (copying on fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable() is safe.

Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in ->full_fds_bits[] - close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with * descriptor table being currently shared * 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table * 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors. In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g. spawn a child with CLONE_FILES, get all descriptors in range 0..127 open, then close_range(64, ~0U, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) and watch dup(0) ending up with descriptor #128, despite #64 being observably not open.

The minimally invasive fix would be to deal with that in dup_fd(). If this proves to add measurable overhead, we can go that way, but let's try to fix copy_fd_bitmaps() first.

* new helper: bitmap_copy_and_expand(to, from, bits_to_copy, size). * make copy_fd_bitmaps() take the bitmap size in words, rather than bits; it's 'count' argument is always a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, so we are not losing any information, and that way we can use the same helper for all three bitmaps - compiler will see that count is a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG for the large ones, so it'll generate plain memcpy()+memset().

Reproducer added to tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 11, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-45025(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(17)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 119 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-30 22:51 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-13 07:38 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 21:31 UTCOSV refresh
  35. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-07 21:20 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-45025?
CVE-2024-45025 is a medium vulnerability published on September 11, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix bitmap corruption on closerange() with CLOSERANGE_UNSHARE copyfdbitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first count/BITSPERLONG bits from old->fullfdsbits[] and fill the rest with zeroes. What it does is copying enough…
When was CVE-2024-45025 disclosed?
CVE-2024-45025 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 11, 2024, with the most recent update on November 3, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-45025 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-45025 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-45025?
CVE-2024-45025 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-45025?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-45025, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-45025

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-45025?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.