CVE-2024-43891

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-08-26. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Have format file honor EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED

When eventfs was introduced, special care had to be done to coordinate the freeing of the file meta data with the files that are exposed to user space. The file meta data would have a ref count that is set when the file is created and would be decremented and freed after the last user that opened the file closed it. When the file meta data was to be freed, it would set a flag (EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED) to denote that the file is freed, and any new references made (like new opens or reads) would fail as it is marked freed. This allowed other meta data to be freed after this flag was set (under the event_mutex).

All the files that were dynamically created in the events directory had a pointer to the file meta data and would call event_release() when the last reference to the user space file was closed. This would be the time that it is safe to free the file meta data.

A shortcut was made for the "format" file. It's i_private would point to the "call" entry directly and not point to the file's meta data. This is because all format files are the same for the same "call", so it was thought there was no reason to differentiate them. The other files maintain state (like the "enable", "trigger", etc). But this meant if the file were to disappear, the "format" file would be unaware of it.

This caused a race that could be trigger via the user_events test (that would create dynamic events and free them), and running a loop that would read the user_events format files:

In one console run:

# cd tools/testing/selftests/user_events # while true; do ./ftrace_test; done

And in another console run:

# cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # while true; do cat events/user_events/__test_event/format; done 2>/dev/null

With KASAN memory checking, it would trigger a use-after-free bug report (which was a real bug). This was because the format file was not checking the file's meta data flag "EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED", so it would access the event that the file meta data pointed to after the event was freed.

After inspection, there are other locations that were found to not check the EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag when accessing the trace_event_file. Add a new helper function: event_file_file() that will make sure that the event_mutex is held, and will return NULL if the trace_event_file has the EVENT_FILE_FL_FREED flag set. Have the first reference of the struct file pointer use event_file_file() and check for NULL. Later uses can still use the event_file_data() helper function if the event_mutex is still held and was not released since the event_file_file() call.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
21(Track)
EG Risk 21/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 26, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04 (6.8.0-50.51) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-1019.21~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure (6.8.0-1020.23) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-50.51~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gkeop-6.8 (6.8.0-1002.4) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.6.49osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 125 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 12:03 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-05 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-04 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-04 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-31 01:34 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 10:07 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 02:31 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-07 22:55 UTCOSV refresh
  70. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-43891?
CVE-2024-43891 is a medium vulnerability published on August 26, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Have format file honor EVENTFILEFL_FREED When eventfs was introduced, special care had to be done to coordinate the freeing of the file meta data with the files that are exposed to user space. The file meta data would have…
When was CVE-2024-43891 disclosed?
CVE-2024-43891 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 26, 2024, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-43891 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-43891 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-43891?
CVE-2024-43891 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-43891?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-43891, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-43891

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-43891?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.