CVE-2024-40918

MEDIUMNVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-07-12. NVD baseline CVSS 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds

PA-RISC systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have had problems with random segmentation faults for many years. Systems with earlier processors are much more stable.

Systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have a large L2 cache which needs per page flushing for decent performance when a large range is flushed. The combined cache in these systems is also more sensitive to non-equivalent aliases than the caches in earlier systems.

The majority of random segmentation faults that I have looked at appear to be memory corruption in memory allocated using mmap and malloc.

My first attempt at fixing the random faults didn't work. On reviewing the cache code, I realized that there were two issues which the existing code didn't handle correctly. Both relate to cache move-in. Another issue is that the present bit in PTEs is racy.

1) PA-RISC caches have a mind of their own and they can speculatively load data and instructions for a page as long as there is a entry in the TLB for the page which allows move-in. TLBs are local to each CPU. Thus, the TLB entry for a page must be purged before flushing the page. This is particularly important on SMP systems.

In some of the flush routines, the flush routine would be called and then the TLB entry would be purged. This was because the flush routine needed the TLB entry to do the flush.

2) My initial approach to trying the fix the random faults was to try and use flush_cache_page_if_present for all flush operations. This actually made things worse and led to a couple of hardware lockups. It finally dawned on me that some lines weren't being flushed because the pte check code was racy. This resulted in random inequivalent mappings to physical pages.

The __flush_cache_page tmpalias flush sets up its own TLB entry and it doesn't need the existing TLB entry. As long as we can find the pte pointer for the vm page, we can get the pfn and physical address of the page. We can also purge the TLB entry for the page before doing the flush. Further, __flush_cache_page uses a special TLB entry that inhibits cache move-in.

When switching page mappings, we need to ensure that lines are removed from the cache. It is not sufficient to just flush the lines to memory as they may come back.

This made it clear that we needed to implement all the required flush operations using tmpalias routines. This includes flushes for user and kernel pages.

After modifying the code to use tmpalias flushes, it became clear that the random segmentation faults were not fully resolved. The frequency of faults was worse on systems with a 64 MB L2 (PA8900) and systems with more CPUs (rp4440).

The warning that I added to flush_cache_page_if_present to detect pages that couldn't be flushed triggered frequently on some systems.

Helge and I looked at the pages that couldn't be flushed and found that the PTE was either cleared or for a swap page. Ignoring pages that were swapped out seemed okay but pages with cleared PTEs seemed problematic.

I looked at routines related to pte_clear and noticed ptep_clear_flush. The default implementation just flushes the TLB entry. However, it was obvious that on parisc we need to flush the cache page as well. If we don't flush the cache page, stale lines will be left in the cache and cause random corruption. Once a PTE is cleared, there is no way to find the physical address associated with the PTE and flush the associated page at a later time.

I implemented an updated change with a parisc specific version of ptep_clear_flush. It fixed the random data corruption on Helge's rp4440 and rp3440, as well as on my c8000.

At this point, I realized that I could restore the code where we only flush in flush_cache_page_if_present if the page has been accessed. However, for this, we also need to flush the cache when the accessed bit is cleared in ---truncated---

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3(medium)
EG Risk
28(Track)
EG Risk 28/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity63% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
22%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 12, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-40918(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 124 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-05 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-05 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-05 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-04 12:03 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-04 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-04 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-31 19:12 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-23 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-14 02:25 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-25 23:46 UTCOSV refresh
  41. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-08 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  71. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-40918?
CVE-2024-40918 is a medium vulnerability published on July 12, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: parisc: Try to fix random segmentation faults in package builds PA-RISC systems with PA8800 and PA8900 processors have had problems with random segmentation faults for many years. Systems with earlier processors are much more…
When was CVE-2024-40918 disclosed?
CVE-2024-40918 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 12, 2024, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-40918 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-40918 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 78.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-40918?
CVE-2024-40918 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-40918?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-40918, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-40918

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-40918?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.