CVE-2024-38636

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-06-21. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address

As reported by Yi Zhang in mailing list [1], kernel warning was catched during zbd/010 test as below:

./check zbd/010 zbd/010 (test gap zone support with F2FS) [failed] runtime ... 3.752s something found in dmesg: [ 4378.146781] run blktests zbd/010 at 2024-02-18 11:31:13 [ 4378.192349] null_blk: module loaded [ 4378.209860] null_blk: disk nullb0 created [ 4378.413285] scsi_debug:sdebug_driver_probe: scsi_debug: trim poll_queues to 0. poll_q/nr_hw = (0/1) [ 4378.422334] scsi host15: scsi_debug: version 0191 [20210520] dev_size_mb=1024, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0 [ 4378.434922] scsi 15:0:0:0: Direct-Access-ZBC Linux scsi_debug 0191 PQ: 0 ANSI: 7 [ 4378.443343] scsi 15:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred [ 4378.449371] sd 15:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg5 type 20 [ 4378.449418] sd 15:0:0:0: [sdf] Host-managed zoned block device ... (See '/mnt/tests/gitlab.com/api/v4/projects/19168116/repository/archive.zip/storage/blktests/blk/blktests/results/nodev/zbd/010.dmesg'

WARNING: CPU: 22 PID: 44011 at fs/iomap/iter.c:51 CPU: 22 PID: 44011 Comm: fio Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3+ #1 RIP: 0010:iomap_iter+0x32b/0x350 Call Trace: __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x830 f2fs_file_read_iter+0x156/0x3d0 [f2fs] aio_read+0x138/0x210 io_submit_one+0x188/0x8c0 __x64_sys_io_submit+0x8c/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x86/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76

Shinichiro Kawasaki helps to analyse this issue and proposes a potential fixing patch in [2].

Quoted from reply of Shinichiro Kawasaki:

"I confirmed that the trigger commit is dbf8e63f48af as Yi reported. I took a look in the commit, but it looks fine to me. So I thought the cause is not in the commit diff.

I found the WARN is printed when the f2fs is set up with multiple devices, and read requests are mapped to the very first block of the second device in the direct read path. In this case, f2fs_map_blocks() and f2fs_map_blocks_cached() modify map->m_pblk as the physical block address from each block device. It becomes zero when it is mapped to the first block of the device. However, f2fs_iomap_begin() assumes that map->m_pblk is the physical block address of the whole f2fs, across the all block devices. It compares map->m_pblk against NULL_ADDR == 0, then go into the unexpected branch and sets the invalid iomap->length. The WARN catches the invalid iomap->length.

This WARN is printed even for non-zoned block devices, by following steps.

  • Create two (non-zoned) null_blk devices memory backed with 128MB size each:
nullb0 and nullb1. # mkfs.f2fs /dev/nullb0 -c /dev/nullb1 # mount -t f2fs /dev/nullb0 "${mount_dir}" # dd if=/dev/zero of="${mount_dir}/test.dat" bs=1M count=192 # dd if="${mount_dir}/test.dat" of=/dev/null bs=1M count=192 iflag=direct

..."

So, the root cause of this issue is: when multi-devices feature is on, f2fs_map_blocks() may return zero blkaddr in non-primary device, which is a verified valid block address, however, f2fs_iomap_begin() treats it as an invalid block address, and then it triggers the warning in iomap framework code.

Finally, as discussed, we decide to use a more simple and direct way that checking (map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_MAPPED) condition instead of (map.m_pblk != NULL_ADDR) to fix this issue.

Thanks a lot for the effort of Yi Zhang and Shinichiro Kawasaki on this issue.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/CAHj4cs-kfojYC9i0G73PRkYzcxCTex=-vugRFeP40g_URGvnfQ@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/gngdj77k4picagsfdtiaa7gpgnup6fsgwzsltx6milmhegmjff@iax2n4wvrqye/

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
11%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 21, 2024

Last Modified

October 3, 2025

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 123 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-31 20:42 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-23 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-14 03:55 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-26 01:16 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-08 14:27 UTCOSV refresh
  66. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-38636?
CVE-2024-38636 is a medium vulnerability published on June 21, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: multidev: fix to recognize valid zero block address As reported by Yi Zhang in mailing list [1], kernel warning was catched during zbd/010 test as below: ./check zbd/010 zbd/010 (test gap zone support with F2FS) [failed]…
When was CVE-2024-38636 disclosed?
CVE-2024-38636 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 21, 2024, with the most recent update on October 3, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-38636 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-38636 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 88.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-38636?
CVE-2024-38636 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-38636?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-38636, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-38636

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-38636?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.