CVE-2024-35825

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-05-17. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: gadget: ncm: Fix handling of zero block length packets

While connecting to a Linux host with CDC_NCM_NTB_DEF_SIZE_TX set to 65536, it has been observed that we receive short packets, which come at interval of 5-10 seconds sometimes and have block length zero but still contain 1-2 valid datagrams present.

According to the NCM spec:

"If wBlockLength = 0x0000, the block is terminated by a short packet. In this case, the USB transfer must still be shorter than dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize. If exactly dwNtbInMaxSize or dwNtbOutMaxSize bytes are sent, and the size is a multiple of wMaxPacketSize for the given pipe, then no ZLP shall be sent.

wBlockLength= 0x0000 must be used with extreme care, because of the possibility that the host and device may get out of sync, and because of test issues.

wBlockLength = 0x0000 allows the sender to reduce latency by starting to send a very large NTB, and then shortening it when the sender discovers that there’s not sufficient data to justify sending a large NTB"

However, there is a potential issue with the current implementation, as it checks for the occurrence of multiple NTBs in a single giveback by verifying if the leftover bytes to be processed is zero or not. If the block length reads zero, we would process the same NTB infintely because the leftover bytes is never zero and it leads to a crash. Fix this by bailing out if block length reads zero.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
14%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 17, 2024

Last Modified

December 17, 2025

References (18)

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 121 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-01 03:12 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-23 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-14 10:10 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-26 10:39 UTCOSV refresh
  37. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-08 17:41 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-35825?
CVE-2024-35825 is a medium vulnerability published on May 17, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: ncm: Fix handling of zero block length packets While connecting to a Linux host with CDCNCMNTBDEFSIZE_TX set to 65536, it has been observed that we receive short packets, which come at interval of 5-10 seconds…
When was CVE-2024-35825 disclosed?
CVE-2024-35825 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 17, 2024, with the most recent update on December 17, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-35825 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-35825 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 86.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-35825?
CVE-2024-35825 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-35825?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-35825, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-35825

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-35825?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.