An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 2200, Exynos 1480, Exynos 2400. It lacks proper buffer length checking, which can result in an Out-of-Bounds Write.
CVE-2024-31956
Score 8.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-06-13. NVD baseline CVSS 8.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.4
- EG Score
- 8.4(medium)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity84% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 13, 2024
Last Modified
March 14, 2025
References (2)
- cve@mitrehttps://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates/
- af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://semiconductor.samsung.com/support/quality-support/product-security-updates/
Related CVEs
Related CVEs are temporarily unavailable — the same-product, same-vendor and same-CWE lists could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-31956?
When was CVE-2024-31956 disclosed?
Is CVE-2024-31956 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-31956?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-31956?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-31956
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-31956?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.