An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos Wearable Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_scan_ind(), there is no input validation check on a length coming from userspace, which can lead to integer overflow and a potential heap over-read.
CVE-2024-27367
Score 4.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-09-09. NVD baseline CVSS 4.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 4.4
- EG Score
- 4.4(medium)
- EG Risk
- 20(Track)EG Risk 20/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity44% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 6%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 9, 2024
Last Modified
March 14, 2025
References (2)
Related CVEs
Related CVEs are temporarily unavailable — the same-product, same-vendor and same-CWE lists could not be loaded just now. That is not a sign that none exist; please retry shortly.
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-27367?
When was CVE-2024-27367 disclosed?
Is CVE-2024-27367 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-27367?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-27367?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-27367
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-27367?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.